MDAV28
Well-Known Member
This logic doesn't apply here for 3 reasons:
1)Bigs are less sought after these days, unless they're great at sth.
2)George Hill's game isn't reliant on speed or athleticism. There's very little reason he can't age like an Andre Miller or J Kidd.
3)He was massively underutilized in Indiana and focused way more on his defensive qualities. He's a top5 defender under 6'4"(CP3, Avery Bradley, John Wall, Lowry - in no particular order) - BUT his offense is based on spacing and reading the floor. His length allows him to finish around the basket(70% in 14/15). In 14/15 when the Pacers needed him more as a playmaker, he ended up having a 21 PER and >.2 WS/48 and a low 10% TO ratio. He's awesome. $16M is gonna be a steal that's due to age or Spurs brainwashing if he's still capable when given the opportunity to make plays.
I wasn't necessarily arguing that George can't get $16 million, you don't need to convince me on him.
I thought bigs would be less sought after too but yet here we are.