Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
I like Jason Whitlock. There's a reason Rome always gives him a burn. He speaks truth that many don't want to hear.
He speaks truth that many don't want to hear.
With 2814 in on the game now, this is gittin kinda good, I think. Imma start a new thread in general discussion just to see if anyone wants to pursue these general topics in more depth.
Eric, please stop trolling. You're a mod, you should know better.
I'm not a mod. I was one. I fully acknowledged I've walked closer to the line since then, but I'm still trying to err on the side of caution in that. I think I'm still well on the "appropriate" side.
Is it trolling to point out that people are adding in assumption that has a historical justification, but is not supported by the evidence? I don't think so, but if a moderator tells me I was misbehaving, i'll make sure never to do it again.
Nice try. Moved and merged.
I thihnk the notion of "Oreo" implies there is a right way and a wrong way to be a person based on your level of skin pigmentation.
Eric, please stop trolling.
... if write4u sees this thread his head may explode.
Is it trolling to point out that people are adding in assumption that has a historical justification, but is not supported by the evidence? I don't think so, but if a moderator tells me I was misbehaving, i'll make sure never to do it again.
Aint is masterful at mischaracterizing what he's received warnings for.
For the record, I'll note that he's once again decided to go the "five posts in a row" route in this very thread.
Our rules have the following provisions: Deliberate attempts to disrupt the usability of the boards will be considered trolling. These include ... bizarre formatting of posts ... many new threads started right after each other, etc
I fail to see the distinction between what he's doing and "bizarre formatting of posts" or "many new threads started right after each other." Is there a meaningful distinction between many threads one after another and many posts one after another? They produce the same effect: a cluttered unreadable board.
You've been told in the past numerous times.
we (or at least I) am not going to debate it with you. You've been told to stop, once privately and now once publicly. I'll let you imagine what the next step is.
No, I have not.
I come into a thread which I started, but have been away from, and which has been moved without me having any knowledge of that, and see that several posters have made comments in my absence. So I respond to them separately, and that's "trollin?" You may see it, but I can't.
As far as your citation of the "rules" go, a post is not a "new thread," is it? Nevermind, I forgot, you just said, you're not gunna "debate," anything, with "debate" meaning "respond to requests for clarification."
Don't debate it then. But don't go around, as you have, claimin that everybody knows what the standards are, that mods are never arbitrary or capricious, and that "personal animosities" have nuthin to do with who gets punished. Your personal complaint seems to be that, even though you have me on ignore, I post anyway, and that disturbs you.