Kanter is ripped

[Deleted member 848]

Personally, Im looking forward to yet another season of seeing your predictions backfiring completely. Us Jazz fans should try and come up with a way to get you to dislike most of our players, since the reverse of what you predict seems to always occur.

But seriously, when are you gonna follow your husband on over to the Pups forum?

 

[MVP]

A The rest of us completely understand that this is what you meant with your above posts, as well as understanding how utterly full-of-**** your ball-analytical skills are, if you think??? that Gordon at 9th overall was a terrible pick.

You doing it again kid. None of my quotes you pulled had me saying that Hayward at 9th was terrible pick. Plus that was before last season, so you should use past not present tense English guru.

 

[Deleted member 848]

You doing it again kid. None of my quotes you pulled had me saying that Hayward at 9th was terrible pick. Plus that was before last season, so you should use past not present tense English guru.

When you say that a GM has never made a good lottery pick, and you do not exclaim that Gordon Hayward is an exception, then by default you say that Gordon Hayward was not a good lottery pick. Tell me, does it hurt being out-logic'd by an 18 year old on a monthly basis? It must.

 

[MVP]

My derivation from this statement comes from the fact that you YOURSELF stated that Gordon Hayward was a terrible pick at 9th overall..

So you pulling stuff from your *** based on stuff you pulled from your ***. Nice. Double fail.
See my quotes again. Where did I say that he was terrible pick??? Do you need glasses?

 

[Deleted member 848]

So you pulling stuff from your *** based on stuff you pulled from your ***. Nice. Double fail.
See my quotes again. Where did I say that he was terrible pick??? Do you need glasses?

Use those wonderfully-functioning eyes of yours, and reply to my most recent post. In proper-English this time, for the love of Gordon

 

[MVP]

When you say that a GM has never made a good lottery pick, and you do not exclaim that Gordon Hayward is an exception, then by default you say that Gordon Hayward was not a good lottery pick..

Thanks again for proving me right... it is not even funny, you fail so bad it is ridiculous. By default not a good pick? where is word terrible??? right... I never said it - you pulled it out of you *** again!

 

[Deleted member 848]

thanks again for proving me right... It is not even funny, you fail so bad it is ridiculous. By default not a good pick? Where is word terrible??? Right... I never said it - you pulled it out of you *** again!

lol

yep, o'connor is genius at trading and drafting in second round but it is mystery why he is so horrible when it comes to drafting in first round ( especially in lottery)

You're right, I guess horrible is a much nicer word than terrible eh?

 

[Deleted member 848]

PS, for readers who are interested in what condo we are talking about


https://jazzfanz.com/showthread.php?7467-What-if-we-would-have-not-made-the-D-Will-trade/

 

[MVP]

lol
You're right, I guess horrible is a much nicer word than terrible eh?

Seriously? kid, I was talking about O'Connors drafting in first round. Not about Hayward being terrible pick. See the difference? Do not make wrong conclusions and start embarrassing yourself. You failed again.

 

[Deleted member 848]

lol







You're right, I guess horrible is a much nicer word than terrible eh?

Man, you're gonna have the taste of DalaBalls in your mouth for weeks after this thread dies out

Seriously? kid, I was talking about O'Connors drafting in first round. Not about Hayward being terrible pick. See the difference? Do not make wrong conclusions and start embarrassing yourself. You failed again.

- You said he has been HORRIBLE in the first round, ESPECIALLY in the lottery. WHEN YOU SAY THIS, it applies to EVERY SINGLE PLAYER he has ever drafted.


THUS, you are BY DEFAULT concluding that Hayward was a horrible pick, especially seeing as he was picked in the lottery. How can I make this any more clear to you? You made ZERO EXCEPTION to saying that Hayward perhaps went against this reputation of KOC that you had concluded

 

[MVP]

When you say that a GM has never made a good lottery pick, and you do not exclaim that Gordon Hayward is an exception, then by default you say that Gordon Hayward was not a good lottery pick. Tell me, does it hurt being out-logic'd by an 18 year old on a monthly basis? It must.

Read my quote one more time!
AK was drafted by Layden not O'Connor. Dwill over C.Paul to me was and is bad mistake. Hayward has shown nothing yet to say he was worth 9th pick.

I said numerous times before last season that jury is still out on Hayward and that IMHO there were better players available, based on rookie player stats. Stop pulling **** out of your ***, it starts to stink here.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Read my quote one more time!
AK was drafted by Layden not O'Connor. Dwill over C.Paul to me was and is bad mistake. Hayward has shown nothing yet to say he was worth 9th pick.

I said numerous times before last season that jury is still out on Hayward and that IMHO there were better players available, based on rookie player stats. Stop pulling **** out of your ***, it starts to stink here.

Wait.....what???

that IMHO there were better players available,

Lemme get this straight

that IMHO there were better players available,

So there were better players available at the 9th pick, that you decided based on rookie stats.



My original post in this thread:

Classic AKMVP. Remember when he was trying to convince everyone that Hayward shouldn't have even gone top 15?? Saying that Players like PPatt would've been better selections at #9?

Keep making assumptions after a player plays for a single season, it seems to be going super well for ya.

You just confirmed my initial post in this thread. Good discussion AKMVP, but it looks like you lose again.