What's new
By:

Kyle Anderson an option for the Jazz?

Beantown

Beantown

Well-Known Member
Nbadraft.net has the Jazz picking him with the 5th pick. Now he isn't the sexiest pick or the most athletic but his all around game is pretty amazing. He is 6'9 with a 7'2 wingspan. He his shooting 50% from three. Here are his stats:

14.7 pts, 8.7 rbs, 6.5 ast, 1.8 stl

Pretty insane stats. He has amazing court vision. If he can add some muscle he would be a great Small forward along with Hayward playing the shooting guard.

If Wiggins/Parker/Exum/Embiid/Exum.....are already gone I think the Jazz should seriously consider him.

It would be a pretty disappointing draft selection though. Wish he would fall to that GSW pick.
 
No way with the 5th. Take Gordon if wiggins, parker, exum and embiid are gone. Hell, I'd rather gamble andtake their backup Zach Lavine.
 
I think Kyle Anderson is going to have a good NBA career, but there is no way we pick him with our first pick. I think we would pick Doug McDermott before we pick Kyle Anderson. There is a chance he falls to us with the GS pick.
 
We already have a bunch of safe players on the team, solid if unspectacular young players. This pick should be a reach, even if it busts. The sad thing is that some of the worst mistakes by this team in the draft have been reaches like that, so it is a nervous proposition.
 
Hey Beantown, you ignorant prick, we have a draft thread.


PS: What you said about Archie is what makes you an ignorant prick. *******.
 
Catchall said:
There are some nice picks in the late lottery. Wish we had another pick there.
Click to expand...

We kept Marvin instead, even though he can't play a full season, is slumping, and clearly is not a stretch-4.

Wish I knew the details of that trade scenario, like whose pick it was, and what the deal was.
 
Also it's worth noting that basically no one has ever posted as low of steal/blk rates as McDermott and gone on to have a successful NBA career.
 
He's an interesting player, super slow from what I've seen. I would reach with the 5th pick. There's some interesting players mid draft.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];790953 said:
^solid tactic....

match classlessness with classlessness. That'll fix things.
Click to expand...

Is there a particular reason you're following me around?

It's kinda weird.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];790972 said:
Have you heard of the ACTIVITY STREAM? In case you haven't, all your drivel from all teh threads can be seen there, in one spot.
Click to expand...

Right, of course you do realize that this theme of you following me around happened a week or two ago, and the activity stream has been around for much longer.

I know this is probably really hard for you to understand, but I can try typing a little more slowly, maybe that will help your comprehension.
 
Hantlers said:
Right, of course you do realize that this theme of you following me around happened a week or two ago, and the activity stream has been around for much longer.

I know this is probably really hard for you to understand, but I can try typing a little more slowly, maybe that will help your comprehension.
Click to expand...

I'm just catching you up on all the existing technology, braugh. I know you're a bit of a luddite fundamentalist, so I'm just making sure you've heard of the STREAM.

Glad to know yr kool w it.
 
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];790975 said:
I'm just catching you up on all the existing technology, braugh. I know you're a bit of a luddite fundamentalist, so I'm just making sure you've heard of the STREAM.

Glad to know yr kool w it.
Click to expand...

Well thanks for being so thoughtful!

This doesn't explain why you're following me around though, you keep on avoiding answering that one.

Oh, and just so you know, fundamentalism is generally only referred to in religion. The Luddite movement was not religious, so calling me a Luddite fundamentalist doesn't exactly work. It was a nice try though!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top