I'd add being disruptive as an important defensive trait. I only say we need a guy that can cover 2/3s because Royce does better against bigger wings and Gay should do well too. We got torched by small/quick guards more than I'd like. I'd prefer to get a Smart/Melton/Beverly type more than a RoCo/Tucker/ with our current personnel imo. All are helpful of course.
Smart is probably a bad guy to use because he's incredibly versatile defensively. Legit can handle 1-4 for the most part and does all the rotation, deflection, stuff you'd want with the ability to stick to his defender.
Agreed on the first part. I just think that as long as we have Conley/Mitchell/Bogey on the court, it's a buffet of bad defenders for quick guards to feast on. There's an outside chance that Bogey doesn't close games, but Conley and Mitchell are going to be there and it's going to be a problem you have to solve with good team defense IMO.
I also think it's pretty much impossible to stick on someone these days. Nobody in the league is really capable of doing that, so it really comes down to how well you help/recover. That being said, some resistance is always better than zero resistance. One thing I thought the Bucks were really great at is their ability to stunt and recover with Lopez and Giannis. But that was only possible because their guards were good enough to give the big a chance.
Our guards/wings were just getting toasted defensively and giving up straight line drives. There is no player, not even Giannis or Draymond, who could stop the situation Gobert was presented with.