https://www.nba.com/jazz/features/locked_on_jazz.html
8/31 8:00am - How different will Al Jefferson be from Carlos Boozer?
Al Jefferson and Carlos Boozer will be compared for the foreseeable future. Far easier for Jefferson than being compared to Karl Malone.
However, up to this point in their careers the only similarity for Jefferson and Boozer is that they are both highly productive power forwards on the offensive end of the floor.
By analyzing Synergy Sports it become evident that how Boozer and Jefferson get their numbers and where they work on the floor is not similar at all.
Yesterday, we pointed out that Jefferson was completely absent from the transition game in Minnesota. Last season, Jefferson had just 18 field goals in transition, contrasting Boozer who had 73.
Boozer was vastly more effective in transition. Boozer converted on 79% of his transition opportunities turning 15% of them into “AND 1“‘s (capitalized since he screamed it). Jefferson, on the other hand, hit just 58% and had only 4 and 1’s in transition all season.
Jefferson’s lack of transition game may be due to poor point guard play. However, Minnesota played one of the faster pace games in the NBA leading me to surmise that either Minnesota out ran Jefferson or he wasn’t in condition to be a part of transition.
The Jazz run the best secondary break in the game. This is where the initial break is clear and they get into their offensive set quickly prior to the defense getting established. Jefferson is going to need to take a page out of the Mailman’s game for some easy baskets.
Once the game got to the half court the two players were very different as well. Simplifying, Boozer is a variety player and Jefferson is a post player.
Jefferson used 57% of his possessions as a post up. This is one of the highest numbers in the league. Boozer had a higher variety to his game.
Boozer used 22% of his possessions both coming off a cut and on post-ups. He also received 14% of his action off the pick and roll and 11% off of spot up.
Jefferson was inactive in these parts of the game. He had just 7% of his action off a cut and just 6% off both pick and roll and spot up opportunities.
Some of this is a result of the Minnesota offense that rarely gave him the ball on the move or with any advantage. Some of this is his game. He is not as good a shooter as Boozer in the spot up circumstances, but the difference is not as glaring as I would have presumed.
Last year, Jefferson hit just 27 of 72 on spot ups (38%) compared to Boozer’s 71 of 169 (42%). This again begs the question with better teammates will these numbers equal out.
Overall last year, Boozer averaged 1.02 Points per possession while Jefferson averaged .95. However, most of the difference stems from productivity in the pick and roll and transition from Boozer that Jefferson didn’t equal.
If Jefferson embraces the Utah Jazz system their is no reason to believe he can’t equal or surpasses those numbers from Boozer last season. Coupled with a game more focussed on being around the basket Jefferson should open the floor more than Boozer did a year ago.
The Jazz had moved away from a pure post up game the last few years with Carlos. That will return with Jefferson. What is unknown is how many things Jefferson has in his game that have not been uncovered that the Jazz system will discover and unveil.