A new device is not needed. The old firearm standby is enough of an equalizer.
https://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/2014/11/edmonds-woman-shoots-home-intruder/
Happy Thanksgiving, indeed.
Contribution.
She'd have been smarter to shoot him in the chest or head. Ordinary citizens are likely to be charged for ineffective deadly force. If it's your life at stake, you can't afford to be half-hearted or half-witted. I hope there is enough public outrage against the intruder to intimidate the police and keep them afraid to file charges against her.
Women have many options in our society so there is no need for sicko mutilation thoughts. Lawyers are more fearsome than guns, actually.
Smarter? Not sure if your post was a tongue in cheek response. If not, then I think you either play too many video games or watch too many Seagal movies....maybe it's a combination of both. Regardless, to think that all it takes to shoot someone in the head or in the torso is smarts, well, I think your viewpoint is completely misinformed. That that poor lady had the presence of mind to not only fight off an attacker so late at night but that she also had her wits about her and was able to let incapaciate her attacker says a lot about her. Besides, her state has a strong castle doctrine as well as a strong stand your ground law. Nothing will be filed against her.
@PKM. . . . . coming up on 5000 pretty soon. . . . .
what threads are longer, still, than the LTE?
if OB doesn't spend at least a day studying out his next move he's handicapping himself. . . .
I spent about a half-hour looking at what I would do for each of your two options, so I was ready for this move.