What's new

More Republicans try and kill Democrats

So, no response to “what some of the trashiest republicans and posters on this website were saying when Paul Pelosi was nearly killed”?

He said “Read what some of the trashiest republicans and posters on this website were saying when Paul Pelosi was nearly killed.” I’m sorry, but none of what is posted above is from “republicans and posters on this website.” This forum is a good microcosm. Can you go find nasty things about any given issue when looking for them? Sure. But… on JFC, can you find a single instance of:

- Celebrating, justifying, or reveling in the death of Minnesota politicians?
- Someone condoning attacks on Paul Pelosi?

You can’t find that on JazzFanz anywhere. @The Thriller assumes it must be there, so he bumps this thread with an allegation. An allegation completely unsubstantiated.
But on JazzFanz, among our very own posters, you will find abundant endorsement of:

- Two assassination attempts on Trump.
- A CEO being murdered on the streets.
- Charlie Kirk being assassinated in Utah.

Today alone from members of this forum, you have the following:

“He wanted a culture war and he got one.”

“thought and prayers lol. Couldn't happen to a nicer person.”

“Political violence will always have its place. I hate Charlie Kirk, he's a hateful man and I'm glad he's dead. It's good for humanity.”

“The far right lost an asset today, that is a win.”

“I wish there was a hell so he could burn there for eternity.”

And many more. Thriller thought something must be true and spoke it. That’s probably a good example of the house of cards he often builds for himself. He’s posted in this thread since and can’t come back and support his comment because he has nothing to support it with. Find me any comments from JazzFanz posters supporting political violence or cheering it on. You start with this thread, as Thriller implied it’s there.

I’ll wait.

I stand by what I've said, people like Kirk, Bannon, Trump, they're scum. The world will be better without them, they spend their lives creating division and profiting from it. You may not have another free election in your country, ponder that, consider Charlie Kirk's significant role in making that a reasonable possibility.
 
Fair point. I know this has nothing to do with your point and admit to totally moving the goal posts but I think there might be a reason for the difference.

I have never seen Paul pelosi or the Minnesota Democrats who were assassinated go around the country picking fights with anyone and everyone and say things like empathy is bad and gun deaths are a fine price to pay to own a gun and use Nazi symbols etc.

Could be that the reaction from some posters was influenced by Kirks own career and the rhetoric that comes with it. His career seems to be based on come at me bro. He wants to anger people with his debates. He wants to own the libs. That is how he makes money. If he showed up to these debates and everyone was like "I agree with you charlie, great point" and then they give each other a nice hug then he would not make any money. He wants the anger to generate clicks.

Maybe if the left wing equivalent of Charlie Kirk was killed we would see similar comments. Is there a left wing equivalent to Charlie Kirk?

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk

Good post. There isn't a left wing equivalent to Kirk.
 
Good post. There isn't a left wing equivalent to Kirk.

There is no left wing equivalent to the hatred and violence on the right, I cannot think of anyone, anywhere advocating for a left wing version of what's happening on the far right. How ridiculous they are, shouting about communism. Communism? In 2025? People with imaginations like that should write kids books.
 
Good post. There isn't a left wing equivalent to Kirk.
But they claim the left is worse. I would love for an honest republican to show us the left equivalent of Kirk, Bannon and Trump himself. Show us who on the left is posting memes about bringing the apocalypse down on American cities just because the Governor and Mayor state their opinion that military intervention isn't needed. And that is one of literally HUNDREDS if not THOUSANDS of such comment by our Fascist in Chief. Show us the left equivalent there please, or STFU and GTFO.
 
There are no popular democrat voices you morons. When your positions are widely unpopular and incoherent it is difficult to grow a following.

Hmmm... a popular democrat voice that republicans desperately want to murder because they are effective at encouraging young people to vote and engage in discourse? Of course there are not democrat equivalents to Charlie Kirk.

Can you believe that most people don't see how constantly focusing all their energy into hating Trump doesn't improve their lives? Constantly hating Trump is about all online democrat influencers can offer. Most college kids are noticing, and have moved way beyond the Trump hate you morons have dedicated your lives to.
 
I stand by what I've said, people like Kirk, Bannon, Trump, they're scum. The world will be better without them, they spend their lives creating division and profiting from it. You may not have another free election in your country, ponder that, consider Charlie Kirk's significant role in making that a reasonable possibility.
not really sure what your point is. are you saying Kirk deserved to die?
 
Back
Top