Fair point. I know this has nothing to do with your point and admit to totally moving the goal posts but I think there might be a reason for the difference.
I have never seen Paul pelosi or the Minnesota Democrats who were assassinated go around the country picking fights with anyone and everyone and say things like empathy is bad and gun deaths are a fine price to pay to own a gun and use Nazi symbols etc.
Could be that the reaction from some posters was influenced by Kirks own career and the rhetoric that comes with it. His career seems to be based on come at me bro. He wants to anger people with his debates. He wants to own the libs. That is how he makes money. If he showed up to these debates and everyone was like "I agree with you charlie, great point" and then they give each other a nice hug then he would not make any money. He wants the anger to generate clicks.
Maybe if the left wing equivalent of Charlie Kirk was killed we would see similar comments. Is there a left wing equivalent to Charlie Kirk?
Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
Good post. There isn't a left wing equivalent to Kirk.