What's new

My Apologies

Jason

Administrator
Staff member
I debated just attaching to one of the many open threads on this but decided - HEY, THEY ALL STARTED ONE, I SHOULD TOO. Seriously though, I wanted to make sure it didn't get lost.

Recently we closed a thread that had been open for years. There was always an unwritten caution on that thread indicating the pictures inside it may not be appropriate. I understood that and a handful of the moderators understood that. I stopped viewing it and I know others did as well. We have a system whereby items can be reported and it was used plenty for that thread. That's how we chose to deal with it then, again unwritten or discussed. Now, after getting a PM from someone on the site asking us to revisit the appropriate nature of the thread in whole, we discussed it. Those that got a chance a vote agreed that its time should probably be over and that it had degraded if it didn't start that way initially anyway. If anything is true, we know there is no one line when it comes to what is appropriate or inappropriate when we talk about each of us as an individual.

There are days when I wonder whether it is worth it. I know the site is a community though and that's the struggle. Some people really enjoy it and I have to assume that is many versus the few. The site has lost some of the most active users many times over the 16+ years. I think it's a natural thing and, as someone said it in one of the 12,342 threads about this, there are cliques established and it might be difficult to get in to the community. I hope that isn't the case but I believe, in some ways, that is the case. Everyone thinks any new name is an alt. Perhaps that too is the case but I know there are probably thousands that view the site and never post nor have an account. I would hope that if any of them decided today was the day, that we'd welcome them.

Yes, I asked for this site to be family friendly since day one. Yes, the lines are NOT clear. But when a thread degrades and people push the limits, the moderators took action. I thank them for that. They do a thankless job and it is obvious I'm not around as much as most of them. I'm sorry for that and I'll see if I can change that because, after all, it is my edict for family friendly I suppose.

Is it wrong of me to want a more friendly and open community? I don't know. Perhaps when I look at other communities where people can get away with anything and only get banned for hating on the team/topic or via a unilateral decision by the owner that that is the better way to go. I think I've only done that once, and you're welcome Trout. Seriously though, I don't have all the answers. I know what has seemed to work and that there are many that visit the site from work or in front of their children. I know my children don't visit the site but, if they did, I would hope they see that there are values here that coincide with how I'd like them to be as individuals. I've said it before, I love this community and what it has become. I am grateful that so many of you waste (yes, I said waste) so much time on here and have built true friendships with each other as a result of this community. I don't want to see that change but there are times when I question it. I've had offers for the site, even as recently as a week ago. They aren't near the value I place on this thing and I always wonder what that would mean to the community if I accepted any of them. Maybe it would be ten times better and I should take my ball and go home and let it happen. I've always wanted to focus on a good experience for all of you. This went beyond the family friendly thing with limited ads and specifically ads that didn't take over the entire screen or play obnoxious audio and the like. A few of you may remember when we broke off from RealGM in part because of this. JazzFanz won't be around forever and it is constantly changing. I just hope its for the better.

I ask that you voice your dissatisfaction as you have been but have respect for the person listening. That holds true for the moderation team first, and the community as a whole second. We listen. I listen. If you have a better way, lets talk. But before you decide just removing the profanity filter and allowing anything to reign on here, take a look at other communities and decide if that's what you want. If it is, fine. We'll go that direction. But I need your help to convince me of that first. I've heard/read the opinion of a few but feel free to send me a PM or something and lets discuss it more. The world isn't what it was even 16 years ago I know but I know some things still aren't allowed on network television and I've seen other communities and want better for us.

Thank you for coming here. Thank you for participating. If you don't have an account, create one and tell me why you didn't create one prior or use the Contact Us. If you have an account and 100,000 posts but really want the option to post porn, tell me that too. In the end, I should be one under fire -- not colton, Stoked, Mo, Bronco, ONE LOVE, Spazz, kicky, Rev, bigb (yeah, we still love you), and Nate. In addition, none of you should be under fire either for voicing your opinion on one "side" or the other. Gameface is a huge contributor and I've enjoyed reading his posts when I can (except for a few a couple years back). He has opened his home to us, literally!

JazzFanz is what I built and you all are maintaining it. I'm sorry things blew up but lets discuss it in a positive way...

(ok, waiting for the tldr's now)
 
r


and I'll try to do bullet points (we need a new term for that by the way) for the tl,dnr crowd
 
for a summary, please see the carroted (^) points below

^ EVERYONE ELSE STARTS THREADS, I SHOULD TOO.

^ Posters complained when a thread was closed that had been open for a long time

^ Many individual posts in that thread had been reported over the years, and some specific actions taken on those posts.

^ People still complained

^ There is no one line when it comes to what is appropriate or inappropriate when we talk about each of us as an individual.

^ There are days when I wonder whether it is worth it.

^ I know the site is a community though and that's the struggle. Some people really enjoy it

^ The site has lost some of the most active users many times over the 16+ years. I think it's a natural thing...

^ I know there are probably thousands that view the site and never post nor have an account.

^ I asked for this site to be family friendly since day one.

^ Yes, the lines are NOT clear.

^ when a thread degrades and people push the limits, the moderators take action

^I am grateful that so many of you waste (yes, I said waste) so much time on here and have built true friendships with each other as a result of this community.

^ We listen. I listen. If you have a better way, lets talk.

^ Thank you for coming here. Thank you for participating.

^ JazzFanz is what I built and you all are maintaining it. I'm sorry things blew up but lets discuss it in a positive way...


there's lots more in the original post so please read it through if you have a chance

AND THANK YOU JASON

:thumbsup:
 
It doesn't matter. A tiny minority of posters (content creators, lol) are making a fuss over nothing. The future of this community will not depend on whether you chose to close a thread with "inappropriate" pictures or not. I visit this site out of habit. The appeal isn't the kind or level of discussions to be had here. It's just killing time with people I've got used to talking to. As long as I can continue to do that within the same guidelines that I'm used to, then I will continue to do so until I lose interest. And I don't think those guidelines have been overly suffocating. I have received only a single infraction over the past 5 years, and I've never went out of my way to rein in my behavior. And I doubt many would say that I'm a "vanilla" poster.

I bet the vast majority of posters don't give two ****s about this controversy. Hell, had I been a mod, I wouldn't have even addressed it beyond saying that the thread got too many complaints and we decided to close it.

Those who are upset will get over it. And if they don't, they don't. Life goes on.
 
This is also a good chance to lay out an idea for change or a general complaint that someone has and have Jason, Colton and the mods listen.
 
Complaining is part of the fun. If the site were perfect (whatever that means) it would also be boring as hell.

Jason and the rest of the crew are good dudes and dudettes.

Something Jason said that is very true is the number of lurkers. I started a thread maybe a year ago asking lurkers to post and introduce themselves. I was surprised to see at least 20 - 25 people immediately post and all had 'aged' join dates. Some stuck around a while and made great contributions, some were funny and joined right in.

I would think it would be near unanimous that posters here are pro growth.

We should make a concerted effort to lure out the lurkers and keep them engaged. The alts are usually pretty damn obvious. I don't believe new posters get run off because they are called an alt.. I really don't. I can see, though, how the inside jokes makes the experience less engaging. No idea how to fix that.
 
Complaining is part of the fun. If the site were perfect (whatever that means) it would also be boring as hell.

Jason and the rest of the crew are good dudes and dudettes.

Something Jason said that is very true is the number of lurkers. I started a thread maybe a year ago asking lurkers to post and introduce themselves. I was surprised to see at least 20 - 25 people immediately post and all had 'aged' join dates. Some stuck around a while and made great contributions, some were funny and joined right in.

I would think it would be near unanimous that posters here are pro growth.

We should make a concerted effort to lure out the lurkers and keep them engaged. The alts are usually pretty damn obvious. I don't believe new posters get run off because they are called an alt.. I really don't. I can see, though, how the inside jokes makes the experience less engaging. No idea how to fix that.

I think if we improved our overall BBall discussion and didn't go at each other as hard it might help lure them out.
 
I love this site. Don't change anything.

Well, maybe one thing.

I know I've been guilty of this, but I would come down harder and faster on posters that attack other posters personally (name calling, etc).

It's okay to go after and debate ideas. I love that. But calling a poster stupid, etc drives people away.

That's my two cents.
 
I love this site. Don't change anything.

Well, maybe one thing.

I know I've been guilty of this, but I would come down harder and faster on posters that attack other posters personally (name calling, etc).

It's okay to go after and debate ideas. I love that. But calling a poster stupid, etc drives people away.

That's my two cents.

Welp. That sure was an invitation.
 
So you are telling that mods didn't do their job by not viewing a thread and let it get out of hand. Now you have to lock the thread altogether, not remove which is weird. Everyone you are protecting can still see it.

I don't really care about the thread. I had some fun reading it but it's not make or break for me. It was for others apparently and the behaviour of mods is one of the key reasons for that. And you shouldn't take all the blame.
 
I had an idea today. Maybe if every post that got moderated had a note added to it by the moderators, people could see what was "over the line". For example, if a poster was issued a warning or infraction, the mod could into that post and add a little note that said "this post was reported and a warning/infraction was issued for x reason". That way, the general populace can see that it was over the line and by how far (warning vs. infraction). If things are still done the way they were when I was a mod, nobody but the mods and the poster knows (unless said poster goes off on a rant).
 
I had an idea today. Maybe if every post that got moderated had a note added to it by the moderators, people could see what was "over the line". For example, if a poster was issued a warning or infraction, the mod could into that post and add a little note that said "this post was reported and a warning/infraction was issued for x reason". That way, the general populace can see that it was over the line and by how far (warning vs. infraction). If things are still done the way they were when I was a mod, nobody but the mods and the poster knows (unless said poster goes off on a rant).

I like that idea.
I will say, though, that every infraction I have ever had was accompanied by a PM from a mod with explanation.
 
I like that idea.
I will say, though, that every infraction I have ever had was accompanied by a PM from a mod with explanation.

They all are. It's auto generated. The mod just writes the explanation. But the private part of a private message makes it so not everyone else knows an action was taken. This would.
 
You seem to have a tenuous grasp on exactly what the function of a moderator is.

That is because you are not giving me much to work it. I thought that mods would moderate a thread that generated constant reports and made most of the mods not want to see it.
 
Top