green
Well-Known Member
I'd say that's less than market worth for how much money Steph brings in.
I'd pay Steph twice that much. He is underpaid.
I'd say that's less than market worth for how much money Steph brings in.
[TWEET]881001493108621313[/TWEET]
https://twitter.com/adammkaufman/status/881001493108621313
I'm glad this happened, but man if I were a Pacers fan I'd be pissed. Could have had a bidding war (real or artificial) if they had waited.
Shocked!
Does GS have the cash to start paying the repeat offender penalties in 2 more years?
Teague officially signed for 3-years $57M a year. That comes out to $19M a year.
I'm wondering what Hill ends up getting. People are saying he turned down $20M a year during extension talks with Utah.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
I think Teague took a discount and wanted to play there. It's a pretty good situation.
Maybe, maybe not and maybe his toe is ****ed and maybe we still sign Hill for much less than originally thought.So we could have waited on our PG problem and got Hill for less than projected?
So we could have waited on our PG problem and got Hill for less than projected?
HahaI'd pay Steph twice that much. He is underpaid.
Teague vs Rubio?
Could we have gotten Teague???
Rubio is a much better defender for sure, but Teague is a better shooter. Passing is a wash at the moment.
Yes. I'm wondering how they can keep Durant with just cap space though. They're over the cap and don't have his Bird rights. Can someone explain the dynamics on that? I thought they could only afford him because Curry was so damn cheap.
NON-BIRD EXCEPTION -- This is also a component of the Veteran Free Agent exception. Its name is somewhat of a misnomer, since Non-Bird really is a form of Bird rights. Players who qualify for this exception are called "Non-Qualifying Veteran Free Agents" in the CBA. They are veteran free agents who are neither Qualifying Veteran Free Agents nor Early Qualifying Veteran Free Agents, and include the following:
Players who finished the season with a given team, who have played no more than one season without clearing waivers or changing teams as a free agent.
Players who were Early Bird free agents, but whose team renounced its right to use the Early Bird exception to re-sign the player.
Players who were to be Larry Bird or Early Bird free agents, were playing on one-year contracts, and were traded mid-season.
This exception allows a team to re-sign its own free agent to a salary starting at up to 120% of his salary in the previous season2 (not over the maximum salary, of course), 120% of the minimum salary, or the amount needed to tender a qualifying offer (if the player is a restricted free agent -- see question number 44), whichever is greater. Raises are limited to 4.5% of the salary in the first year of the contract, and contracts are limited to four seasons when this exception is used.
Hindsight is great, isn't it? The plan was to extend Hill. HE was making what, $8M/per. Jazz brought him in, probably thinking they could extend him at $12M tops. But then he played like an all-star and decided he was worth more...much more. Reportedly, Jazz were willing to go as high as 4/$80M. Hill wanted a LOT more.Teagues at under 20 million per year? The Hill trade looks worse and worse every day.