The insult was unnecessary, and given how many of those you've taken, your response is to be expected.In fact, post 459 of this thread, which I authored, is what started this whole discussion. Perhaps you should read before insulting?
However, you also authored this steaming pile of **** post:
Joe is shooting poorly. Yep. But attempting to breakdown how bad this post is:Or continue to pay a large contract to an overrated Australian who can’t stay healthy?
1 - Joe signed his contract in July 2017 that was for four years. In the following two years, he was the team's third best player, fourth at worst (I think Favors is a nice player who has had little to do with the Jazz's success, given how the Jazz did in '16-'17 and now, I think it's hard to make the counter-argument). I am basing this on that his skills (his shooting, his passing, his defense, his savvy) facilitated a bunch of pieces that couldn't work together (a high-usage player and absolute non-shooters) and that his +/- bears that out.
2 - Joe signing a four-year contract has nothing to do with not having depth at a position (according to you) where depth is readily found for cheap.
3 - "Can't stay healthy?" He's played more consecutive games than any active player. He's done it playing a ton of minutes at an age he shouldn't, guarding the toughest assignment every night. If he's not healthy, that's a choice, and it's thus far been far more the exception than it has been the rule.
4 - point #2 repeated or elaborated upon about 10 more times.
For the record, Bradley has a 25 PER. I'm down to get someone that doesn't play ogre-ball or can score, but our backups have been doing okay.
Have a good night.
Last edited: