TheStormofWar
Well-Known Member
I don't disagree with any of this. Westbrook and Harden are both better with the ball in their hands and it's a valid concern as to how they cooperate on the court together. But you're ignoring the potential positives of this trade for Houston too. Westbrook is playing with good shooters and playing in a good offensive system for the first time in his career I think. He's going to have an easier time getting to the rim. He's going to get easier looks. He's going to get more rest. Harden is going to get more rest. As a whole they probably come out somewhat even in this deal.
Westbrook not being surrounded by shooters is a myth. During the regular season, OKC shot 34.8% from while Houston shot 35.6%. That's including Rustbrook's blistering 29% from three. Taking that into account, OKC was probably better in that regard. Houston simply took more than any other team.
The problem is efficiency. Simply put, both teams relied heavily on their star (Westbrook and Harden) so much that they were 1 and 2 in usage rates last year. Simply put, both want the ball in their hands. With Harden, he's absolutely deadly. Westbrook strikes no fear in me anymore as his shot has declined so much in the last three years. Now I will grant that D'Antoni might be able to make it work because he is a good coach, but Westbrook is his own worst enemy. Now add to that that neither Harden nor Westbrook are exactly great defenders and Utah amped up it's backcourt with Conley?
Houston will win some games in the regular season, but they're going to run into the same issues as OKC with first round exits.