gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
The question is essentially who you'd rather have at the 3 next year; Millsap, CJ or AK? I'd go with Millsap.
Somebody else. If it's really a choice between those 3 at SF then AK.
The question is essentially who you'd rather have at the 3 next year; Millsap, CJ or AK? I'd go with Millsap.
Jefferson. I want the better player starting. I would rather have both, but only if Millsap accepts his position as the backup PF. With Millsap as a starting PF you will never be good enough to advance very far in the playoffs.
Jefferson is far better than Boozer on defense. He challenges shots and changes the way teams attack the Jazz. He's not great but better than Boozer.
I believe PNR defense can be taught. I don't like the way the Jazz defend the PNR.
It's far easier to teach fundamentals than size and talent. If Millsap plays "as best he can with his current talent" and he's still worse than Jefferson then I definitely want Jefferson.
Your words make sense, but i already dont think millsap should be the first or second option, i think that millsap should start with kanter, if we can draft him. So we can trade jefferson, because i think 15 million is really too much for jefferson for a small market franchise like utah.
Big guys with talent that can put up the #'s he does and play decent defense are not cheap.
Your words make sense, but i already dont think millsap should be the first or second option, i think that millsap should start with kanter, if we can draft him. So we can trade jefferson, because i think 15 million is really too much for jefferson for a small market franchise like utah.
https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212618/Jazz_Could_Play_Big_Man_Musical_Chairs_in_2011_12
I'm down with giving this a go. I think a simmer down milsap may make a pretty good small forward. I think if the jazz think this option is realistic, we should do whatever to grab kyrie.
If 15 mil is too much for Al, would you have rather had Boozer instead? Get real. Big men who put up those numbers dont come any cheaper. Unless you can magically find a stud PF/C who is 6-10 or 6-11, can average 20/10 and also play great defense and who would be willing to come to Utah for less than 15 mil/year. Good luck.You are talking about a franchise player then.
(The jury is still out on Favors. Even if he does become that stud, he would demand similar kind of money if not more)
And Millsap's ceiling is pretty limited. The guy breaks down whenever called upon to start for large stretches of games and his production is inconsistent(even off the bench). Yes for what we pay him, the value/dollar is good. But that doesnt mean he can substitute a legit big man like Big Al. My only concern about Big Al is that his knee holds up in the long term. He has been great so far(knock wood) this season.
BTW, Millsap at SF is not a bright idea.Maybe for some games, some matchups. But we really need a strong defensive presence in the paint if we make Millsap the SF.
He has to be either a backup PF, or he has to be trade bait for a wing.
The question is essentially who you'd rather have at the 3 next year; Millsap, CJ or AK? I'd go with Millsap.
Big Al's TS% is roughly league average, he is clueless without the ball in his hands, can't pass, and is terrible in transition. His D is roughly average. He's not an impact player. Certainly not worth his contract.Big guys with talent that can put up the #'s he does and play decent defense are not cheap.
Big Al's TS% is roughly league average, he is clueless without the ball in his hands, can't pass, and is terrible in transition. His D is roughly average. He's not an impact player. Certainly not worth his contract.