What's new

Post Count Discrepancy

Status
Not open for further replies.
jason, can you please just make my post count stuck on 0 (or 1, if that's not possible)?
If it's going to be inaccurate, i'd rather it be ironic as well.
 
Hey JI - did the mods delete your thread in the Jazz forum yesterday? I couldn't find it anywhere.

Yes.

I also received an infraction for circumventing the profanity filter.
I communicated with the admin. that I just correctly spelled the player's actual name--and only used that word in that relevant context.
And also mentioned that his name was put into print on numerous well-respected and mainstream mediums.
One specific medium being SB Nation-- which is relevant because it happens to be a source hand-picked by JazzFanz.com to be featured in the newsfeed forum. When faced with all the evidence, including the fact that I had simply done what JazzFanz had already essentially endorsed, I was then told that I was not infracted for the official reason that was given--but due to "trolling," which was determined for some ultimately biased and presumptuous reason.

There is plenty of irony to note here, but what I find especially hilarious is that there happened to be another thread on the front page which CLEARLY (and i mean black-and-white) broke the rules--yet it was not edited, deleted, or infracted in any way. In fact, it was "liked" by several members of the moderation/admin./ownership team--accurately described as the Triangle of Tyranny. Yet my posts which apparently fall under the vague rule of "trolling" were deleted, infracted, and my post count fudged.

Hilarious. And hypocrisy at it's finest.

For all the standards this place claims to strive for, there is a fundamental flaw in the infrastructure that will always hold it back. I've tried exposing the cracks, but admittedly failed in my own mission to educated the masses. Unfortunately, due to my failures, it'll only be visible once the cracks become craters and the entire building comes crumbling down.
Oh well. At least I can say I tried my best.

Good luck, friends.
 
Yes.

I also received an infraction for circumventing the profanity filter.
I communicated with the admin. that I just correctly spelled the player's actual name--and only used that word in that relevant context.
And also mentioned that his name was put into print on numerous well-respected and mainstream mediums.
One specific medium being SB Nation-- which is relevant because it happens to be a source hand-picked by JazzFanz.com to be featured in the newsfeed forum. When faced with all the evidence, including the fact that I had simply done what JazzFanz had already essentially endorsed, I was then told that I was not infracted for the official reason that was given--but due to "trolling," which was determined for some ultimately biased and presumptuous reason.

There is plenty of irony to note here, but what I find especially hilarious is that there happened to be another thread on the front page which CLEARLY (and i mean black-and-white) broke the rules--yet it was not edited, deleted, or infracted in any way. In fact, it was "liked" by several members of the moderation/admin./ownership team--accurately described as the Triangle of Tyranny. Yet my posts which apparently fall under the vague rule of "trolling" were deleted, infracted, and my post count fudged.

Hilarious. And hypocrisy at it's finest.

For all the standards this place claims to strive for, there is a fundamental flaw in the infrastructure that will always hold it back. I've tried exposing the cracks, but admittedly failed in my own mission to educated the masses. Unfortunately, due to my failures, it'll only be visible once the cracks become craters and the entire building comes crumbling down.
Oh well. At least I can say I tried my best.

Good luck, friends.

Yeah if the FO was thinking hard about drafting that player then I can see why you'd bring up that guy. But your intention was dubious at best.... it was an obvious troll attempt and the last I check a troll attempt is infraction worthy also.
 
Yeah if the FO was thinking hard about drafting that player then I can see why you'd bring up that guy. But your intention was dubious at best.... it was an obvious troll attempt and the last I check a troll attempt is infraction worthy also.

That is besides the point but this being your response, as I stated above, is a failure on my part.
Either something is against the rules or it's not. "Intent" is a recipe for corruption and bias.
The mods here have done an excellent job of rallying their message, a much better job than me. They win.
We'll worship like dogs at the shrine of their lies. I'll tell you my infractions and you can sharpen your knife.
Offer me that banless ban, good mod, let me give you my posts. Take us to church.
 
Yeah if the FO was thinking hard about drafting that player then I can see why you'd bring up that guy. But your intention was dubious at best.... it was an obvious troll attempt and the last I check a troll attempt is infraction worthy also.

That is besides the point but this being your response, as I stated above, is a failure on my part.
Either something is against the rules or it's not.

And trolling is against the rules.

So his post was spot on, and not in the least beside the point.
 
Yeah if the FO was thinking hard about drafting that player then I can see why you'd bring up that guy. But your intention was dubious at best.... it was an obvious troll attempt and the last I check a troll attempt is infraction worthy also.
Dubious? No way, the guy plays in the Alberta Colleges Athletic Conference...that place is a gold mine of NBA talent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top