What's new

Prop 2 Utah

Some new developments on the LDS front.
-----

https://www.deseretnews.com/article...-legalize-medical-marijuana-by-years-end.html

Church leaders want Utah Legislature to legalize medical marijuana by year's end
By Tad Walch

SALT LAKE CITY — Leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints want the Utah Legislature to legalize medical marijuana in a special session by the end of 2018.

"We'd like to see it done this year, in a special session this year," said Marty Stephens, the church's director of community and governmental relations. "We'd like to see these people that have needs — truly medical needs — we'd like to see them be able to get access to these medications in an appropriate, safe manner."

But the church does not believe the medical marijuana initiative on November's ballot is the right way to make medical marijuana legal.

The church has joined a broad coalition of medical, law enforcement, educational, religious and other leaders who are urging Utahns to go to the ballot on Nov. 6 to reject Proposition 2. That medical marijuana initiative doesn't protect children, they say. They also say it doesn't resolve unintended consequences that have afflicted medical marijuana programs in other states like Washington and Colorado.

"Proposition 2 is not the right answer," said Elder Jack N. Gerard, executive director of the church's public affairs department. "We're hopeful that as people better understand what is in Proposition 2, that they will join with us to find an appropriate answer in a timely way."

But Latter-day Saint leaders also don't want pain-ridden patients to wait any longer for the relief that medical marijuana can provide.

"There is urgency," said Elder Gerard, 60, who became a General Authority Seventy in March. "This isn't 'let's wait till next year to have a conversation.' It needs to be dealt with soon. There's an urgency to accomplish this. … With this coalition, we're calling on public officials to act and act promptly."

Gov. Gary Herbert's spokesman, Paul Edwards, said the governor would consider a special session under the right circumstances, but believes it is too early to consider one.

"The governor only calls a special session when we have near-consensus on legislative action and language," Edwards said Sunday. "It would be premature to say anything about a special session at this point because there's no such bill that people are looking at right now."

Herbert announced his opposition to Proposition 2 back in March and said he would welcome an alternative. Edwards and others said several different proposals are at the conceptual stage.

"If we see something where we coalesce around what looks like good policy for the state, the governor is more than happy to take a look at that opportunity," Edwards said. "His primary concern is getting to good policy about medical marijuana that allows patients access to compounds that may help them while also protecting public health and public safety."

House Minority Leader Brian King, D-Salt Lake City, agreed with the governor that he would have to wait to see a serious proposal before he could support a special session. King opposes Proposition 2 but said he plans to vote for it and work in the Legislature to fix it afterward.

"Proposition 2 is flawed, in some ways very flawed," he said, "but I'm voting for it because if we vote it down, I think the likelihood that the state Legislature will come back and put in place meaningful medical marijuana is slim and none."

King questioned whether a largely conservative Republican Legislature would pass a meaningful medical marijuana law immediately after voters rejected one in an initiative. He would need to see a specific, concrete proposal before mail-in ballots are sent to voters in a month. A special session of the Legislature would have to take place in November or the first week or two of December.

While King suggested the coalition take the law from one of the 30 states that has legalized medical marijuana and use it as a template, pointing out what it liked and didn't like, Elder Gerard said the church would like to see Utah set a national example with a bill that could be used to pass medical marijuana in any state.

Multiple supporters of the initiative have said they don't have much faith in the Utah Legislature. One of the main reasons they pushed for a ballot initiative is because they say the Legislature has failed to act meaningfully on medical marijuana issues.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, often known as the Mormon church, has aligned itself with a broad coalition against Proposition 2 that includes the Utah Medical Association and other doctors, the Utah PTA and other parents and teachers, multiple law enforcement groups, the Utah Episcopal Diocese and the Islamic Society of Greater Salt Lake.

Elder Gerard said the church wants all parties to come together swiftly to craft a specific, serious, landmark proposal. He said it wants a solution like the landmark Utah Compact on immigration reform and the church's Fairness for All approach that was at the core of a 2015 Utah nondiscrimination lawthat extended protection to LGBT people in housing and employment while also protecting religious rights.

He expressed surprise that headlines have focused on the church's opposition to Proposition 2 and not the first-ever public statement that it accepts medicinal marijuana as a matter of church policy.

In fact, the church's urgent public support of medical marijuana has cheered Enedina Stanger Ramos, an active church member who suffers from chronic, excruciating pain due to multiple medical conditions.

"I don't understand why every (church) member isn't jumping up and shouting for joy and screaming, 'Hallelujah,'" she said. "This is exactly what we've been praying for and hoping for for so many years. This has been the plea that we've had for so long. It has been an answer to prayers."

Elder Gerard said the church's public support of medical marijuana use is a reflection of the leadership of President Russell M. Nelson, a renowned heart surgeon who became the faith's 17th president and prophet in January.

"It's really remarkable the Lord's chosen prophet at this time has great empathy and understanding," Elder Gerard said, adding that President Nelson understands human pain and suffering "not only as a loving, compassionate leader of the church, but he also understands it more from the medical perspective.

"That's why I think it really is quite significant that we've come out to support a broader coalition to work for appropriate, medicinal marijuana use with appropriate safeguards," he said.

The only time the church has publicly supported medical marijuana before now was in February 2016, when leaders said only that they had no objection to a Utah bill that would have legalized cannabidiol, or CBD oil. That bill failed.
While church leaders now support legalized medical marijuana, they say Proposition 2 is a serious threat to health and public safety, especially to Utah teens and children, because they believe it would make marijuana generally available for recreational use with few controls.
 
If you want some form of Medical Marijuana in the state of Utah then you MUST vote YES on PROP 2!

If PROP 2 passes it is still possible for legislators to modify how it is implemented. The only way to have any leverage for getting some form of medical marijuana is to overwhelmingly pass PROP 2. If PROP 2 fails our legislature will point to that and punt on medical marijuana with concerns over the need to study it further, with promises of coming up with something that is "right for Utah" (code for acceptable to LDS leadership). If PROP 2 fails there will be no motivation to come up with a real system for medical marijuana. They will, at best, give us something that they are already indicating, specifically that they want marijuana to be prescribed by your regular doctor and dispensed by a licenced pharmacy. As good as that sounds, that's just a way to say that there will be NO medical marijuana because as we should all know, due to federal category 1 status it is absolutely not possible to get an FDA approved form of prescription medical marijuana, which would have to happen for your doctor to prescribe it and for a pharmacy to dispense it. We are 5-10 years away from any such possibility even if federal prohibition ended today. So to put that condition on medical marijuana is to say that you can have medical MJ just as soon as it becomes legal federally and then undergoes FDA drug trials and then gets marketed by a multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical company in pill form to be dispensed at your local heroine dealer, opps, I mean opioid dispensary, err, I mean licenced pharmacy.

VOTE YES ON PROP 2!
 
My wife and got our ballots and voted yes
 
Why would anyone have issues with other people smoking weed? Is it the joy it brings to people? The millions in revenue for the state? The saved costs on ridiculous incarceration’s?

Wish we could skip medical and go directly to recreational. And I would love to hear any valid arguments against it.
 
My wife and got our ballots and voted yes
I can't say how disappointed I'm going to be if Prop @ fails. I don't even use marijuana and haven't for a long time, but this is just the right thing to do. It's time. We need to take this step.
 
Why would anyone have issues with other people smoking weed? Is it the joy it brings to people? The millions in revenue for the state? The saved costs on ridiculous incarceration’s?

Wish we could skip medical and go directly to recreational. And I would love to hear any valid arguments against it.
You and me both! But we have to start somewhere.

I believe that my father ultimately killed himself because he was fired from a job he had for nearly 25 years when they re-implemented drug testing, he failed for MJ and asked for the courtesy of being allowed to resign and was denied. He created 2 devices that this company (Questar at the time) patented and one of these devices is still used extensively today. That was something well above his pay grade. I'm pretty sure he did it for fun.

His firing there was the beginning of the end for my father. He essentially "self-medicated" with MJ and it worked for him. The next place he worked was as an engineer at the Tooele Army Depot Chemical Weapons Incinerator. At that facility he could not use MJ because they had rigorous drug testing. He couldn't use even prescription depression medication. He was temporarily terminated because he had started using my mother's anti-depression medication in lieu of MJ and was caught. After he was dead I read a letter his boss had written to get him reinstated which made a strong argument that he was absolutely essential to the safe and effective completion of the disposal of chemical weapons at that facility. He got his job back but couldn't use MJ and couldn't use antidepressants. Eventually he killed himself.

We have to start somewhere.
 
Why would anyone have issues with other people smoking weed? Is it the joy it brings to people? The millions in revenue for the state? The saved costs on ridiculous incarceration’s?

Wish we could skip medical and go directly to recreational. And I would love to hear any valid arguments against it.
Not to mention how effective MJ is for arthritis, dementia, migraines, insomnia, nausea, appetite, and to a lesser extent general pain, anxiety (though sometimes it can cause anxiety) and glaucoma. Among other medical benefits (seizures obviously)
 
Any of you guys use CBD oils? If so, what brands and where to you buy them? How much do you spend usually?

I've bought a few cheap ones and feel like they were a waste of money.
 
Not to mention how effective MJ is for arthritis, dementia, migraines, insomnia, nausea, appetite, and to a lesser extent general pain, anxiety (though sometimes it can cause anxiety) and glaucoma. Among other medical benefits (seizures obviously)
I think it was Ron White who said (back when it was Medical only in CA) "I have anxiety. Not having any marijuana makes me anxious. Marijuana cures that!"
 
I always found it interesting that the states that don’t let chemo patients smoke a joint to ease their nausea have a high percentage of people who subscribe to a religious philosophy that at its core is supposed to be about compassion to their fellow man.
 
While King suggested the coalition take the law from one of the 30 states that has legalized medical marijuana and use it as a template, pointing out what it liked and didn't like, Elder Gerard said the church would like to see Utah set a national example with a bill that could be used to pass medical marijuana in any state.

I'm not sure we should be setting the national example, given our history setting alcohol legislation. Is there an example of something similar(medical or leisure) that has shown Utah can set effective, responsible, popular legislation?
 
Why would anyone have issues with other people smoking weed? Is it the joy it brings to people? The millions in revenue for the state? The saved costs on ridiculous incarceration’s?

Wish we could skip medical and go directly to recreational. And I would love to hear any valid arguments against it.

Why? From what I’ve read:

#1 it’s an excellent way to incarcerate a lot of minorities. If you’re trying to disenfranchise a certain demographic from voting, holding office, and otherwise having the freedom and citizenship that others do, then criminalizing MJ is a great way to go. In many African American communities, nearly half of all males can’t vote because of prior drug related crimes. That helps your white republican maintain his dominance. Its worked wonderfully since Nixon.

#2 Big Pharm doesn’t want to compete against it.

#3 in Utah I think there’s more of a cultural stigma attached. Ever since the CC revolution of the 1960s, people with long hair, beards, and MJ users are deemed unholy hippies. No one can explain why you can have a mustache at BYU but not a beard. Likewise, no one can really explain why MJ is bad. Why? Because sometime in the late 60s early 70s the church and many affluent legislators said so.
 
Last edited:
I'll bitch about weed just like I bitch about vap, ecig, and cigs; mother ****ers better just keep their smoke off me. Respect clean air laws.

Other than that, enjoy!

And it looks like we flipped Love.
 
The law will be modified before implementation.
Sadly.

From what i have seen, prop 2 gets voted in and now its just going to be altered to the point that it is basically the compromise bill. That seems illegal to me. If prop 2 is voted in then it should be as is. If someone wants to propose a different law or ammend prop 2 then put that ballot up for vote the next time voting comes around and see if its what the people want.
 
Top