What's new
By:

Question for Mormons

Mormons: Would you only marry if it was to another Mormon?

  • Yes

    Votes: 13 41.9%

  • No

    Votes: 18 58.1%
  • Total voters
    31
NAOS said:
So it's okay to make nearly 20 pages of babble that all operates under the assumption that God is human-like, then took human form as he walked among us? I'd neg 20 all that **** if I had enough to go around.

The respectful thing to do is to talk about what God ALLEGEDLY did... at let other people have their opinion.

Give me a ****ing break. And **** off, Trout.
Click to expand...


Posts like this tend to work against you when you're trying to have educational religious discourse with people who have beliefs different to yours. I know I tend to get along with most of the resident Mo's perfectly fine, despite being far from one.
 
Oooh, and then this gem:

07-05-2012 11:13 PM
NAOS
Thread: Question for Mormons

we were going along peacefully without you, *******
Click to expand...

So, you're not going to give me the respect of my own opinion? How un-Christ like of you.
The respectful thing to do is to talk about what God ALLEGEDLY did... at let other people have their opinion.
Click to expand...
Like I said, you're a ****ing moron and a walking parody. Drop the "I'm practically a professor and have studied every text available, while sipping latte's at Starbucks between 9 hour sessions of WoW" bit, it's obnoxious.
 
TroutBum said:
Essentially, if people don't agree with you, then they're wrong. Got it. I do the same thing all the time, the only difference being that I'm always right. You're a ****ing moron.

Carry on.
Click to expand...

No, again, more wrong from you.
Spouting off in a public forum in ways the pre-condition the limits of a conversation (for example, we are going to discuss spirituality, but only under the banner of the Christian Godhead), should be challenged.

You, for one, should know what it's like to come swinging into a place you're not welcome. I'm surprised you aren't pos repping the hell out of me. But, I don't expect consistency from you.
 
dalamon said:
Posts like this tend to work against you when you're trying to have educational religious discourse with people who have beliefs different to yours. I know I tend to get along with most of the resident Mo's perfectly fine, despite being far from one.
Click to expand...

You are far from everyone.
 
dalamon said:
Naw, tater = reference to a potato in this instance. I will choose not to delve any further into this, as I don't wanna reveal the identity of this account. Not tatermoog.
Click to expand...

Blech, I'm already 1-for-1 on getting him banned, and dammit I'm tired, but I think I'm down to try for number 2.
 
TroutBum said:
Oooh, and then this gem:



So, you're not going to give me the respect of my own opinion? How un-Christ like of you.

Like I said, you're a ****ing moron and a walking parody. Drop the "I'm practically a professor and have studied every text available, while sipping latte's at Starbucks between 9 hour sessions of WoW" bit, it's obnoxious.
Click to expand...

Spazz and I had an interaction that didn't need you.

Besides, what is so wrong with allegedly? Do you think the textual account of what he did captures the full meaning of the act? Doesn't 'allegedly' add a good amount of mystery and openness? Also, do you think the bible records ever single moment of Jesus' life? Probably not.
 
TroutBum said:
Blech, I'm already 1-for-1 on getting him banned, and dammit I'm tired, but I think I'm down to try for number 2.
Click to expand...

Hahaha yup, you're definitely thinking of the right person. I say hold back, his contributions have been great as of late.
 
dalamon said:
Posts like this tend to work against you when you're trying to have educational religious discourse with people who have beliefs different to yours. I know I tend to get along with most of the resident Mo's perfectly fine, despite being far from one.
Click to expand...

grow up 30+ years ago in the suburbs of SLC when you are the only non-mormon. When you accomplish that, get back to me.

Alberta is nowhere near the island that SLC was/is. thxthough
 
NAOS said:
Spazz and I had an interaction that didn't need you.

Besides, what is so wrong with allegedly? Do you think the textual account of what he did captures the full meaning of the act? Doesn't 'allegedly' add a good amount of mystery and openness? Also, do you think the bible records ever single moment of Jesus' life? Probably not.
Click to expand...


I think placing the word allegedly intentionally several times, in bold, in a persons post can come across as quite condescending, especially when coupled with the "now you can continue" remark. There are better ways to communicate your viewpoints, without (accidentally, from what I can tell) coming across as an ***.
 
Fair and balanced comment right here;

Christians - Tend to hide behind simple faith and belief in God and usually answer complex questions with answers like, 'because.'

Athesists - Tend to be self-described intellectual elitists that hide behind challenges such as 'Prove it' when faith is not required to prove.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top