NAOS
Well-Known Member
LOL ... proof?
One Brow sent me a PM when he exited. Blamed 68% of it on your trolling from "New Zealand".
LOL ... proof?
One Brow sent me a PM when he exited. Blamed 68% of it on your trolling from "New Zealand".
LOL ... show me the PM.
I had to clear my inbox, braugh. Besides, you'd deny it anyway.
68% of my reason for leaving jazzfanz is hotttnickkk and his incessant trolling. Another 24% is the trolling of one of his known alts, Eenie-Meenie. I've got other things to do. Ciao.
Found it:
LOL ... you're so desperate to win an argument you had to come up with a fake proof?
Wow.
didn't I tell you that you'd deny it???
I won't deny a real proof, that was fake.
LOL... you have proof??
wow
Show me a screenshot of One Brow's PM to you in your inbox and we'll talk.
you don't think I could fake that if I wanted to? c'mon gui
You've just confirmed you'll need to 'fake it'.
That's proof.
No, I confirmed that it'll all come down to my word versus yours. Besides, didn't you make a resolution to stop screenshotting?
Nah Mods/admin can look into your Inbox to confirm the message as proof if need be.
Actually not. Or at least, not easily. Mods can't do it at all, and admins can only do it with difficulty. I'd have to either reset your password and login as you (which I could do, but not without your knowledge), install a modification to the admin software (which Jason could certainly do and I may or may not be able to do), or else sift through the raw forum database (which I've no idea how to do even if I do have the power (not sure), but again which Jason might be able to do).
Thanks for clarifying Colton.
But all this is academic at this point since NAOS can't even provide a screenshot of the PM in question as a preliminary proof.
I'm not surprised that you'd support total loss of privacy and the institution of extreme police surveillance.
Only in extreme cases when an unfounded accusation is made.