This actually does raise an interesting point of discussion: is "hate-speech" protected by the constitution? Is it constitutional to have a law restricting freedom of expression in any way? I understand the laws of libel/slander, but that usually revolves around some level of falsehood. "Hate-speech" is someone's opinion. I am not advocating "hate-speech" at all, just wondering about the constitutionality of restricting it. I do not agree with speaking that way, but I will defend to the death your right to say it, is that how the saying goes?
[edit: this also has nothing to do with this website restricting it, as the owners/operators have the right to choose what to moderate]
Yes. We need to censor thought. We must censor all thought that is not with the majority. Let us get this on the books a.s.a.p. You are either with us or you are against us. If you are with us then you are free to speak your mind. If not then you are a hating hater face.