What's new

SI top 100 players: 100-51

MrMojoRisin

Well-Known Member
Two jazzmen made the list so far. Hood coming in at #85 and Hill at #56 (note: Teague was ranked #57)

https://www.si.com/nba/2016/09/12/nba-top-100-player-rankings

In Year Two, Rodney Hood completely flipped the script from “Boy, he really slid on draft night” to “Boy, a lot of teams regret that he really slid on draft night.” It’s no wonder that teams like the Thunder and Grizzlies are kicking themselves for passing on Hood (14.5 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 2.7 APG), who went to the Jazz at No. 23 in 2014. There’s a lot to love about Hood’s game: he can play with or without the ball, he can initiate in pick-and-roll settings or space on the wing, he can read team defenses and find the open man, he can swing multiple positions on both offense and defense, and he can handle playing starter minutes in the West even though he’s only 23. Meanwhile, Hood did all of that while playing on a Jazz team that had brutal point guard play and a laundry list of major injuries. There’s no telling how high his utility might climb if he was cast as a third or fourth option behind established superstars, or if Utah’s core group can make it through an entire season together unscathed. (Last year: Not ranked)

His 8.1 career Win Shares rank No. 1 among 2014 draft class members.
Hood, a lefty, studied James Harden to hone his deliberate style in high pick-and-rolls
He's a mediocre defender for his position, with room to improve
He can grow as a closer, shooting just 40% overall (and 24.2 3P%) in clutch situations

Hill's natural inclination is to complement—effectively deferring to his playmaking teammates by helping to establish the spacing they need to thrive. Only 12 players in the league last season finished with a higher three-point percentage than Hill. Among them, only two (Kawhi Leonard and Klay Thompson) have any claim to being a superior defender. That makes Hill a top option within the 3-and-D mold and truly unique in that he defaults as a nominal point guard. Wing players who want the ball in their hands need a teammate like Hill alongside them to be effective in unassuming roles. Don’t confuse Hill’s default preference for inability. When put into situations where his individual creation was needed, Hill has swelled to fill the void. He’s a smart, balanced practitioner of the screen-and-roll with the experience to run an offense. He also just happens to be perfectly willing to take a backseat while another teammate drives or pick up a challenging assignment to save someone else the trouble. Hill is game for whatever, and his open-minded play only serves to broaden his team’s options. (Last year: No. 80).

Previously held up well as a higher-usage pick-and-roll option in the absence of a star
Tall and long enough to realistically defend across three positions
Can easily fade into the background on teams that don’t move the ball consistently
Intermediate game can be a touch erratic
 
Last edited:
So the entire starting unit will be in the top 100.
 
So the entire starting unit will be in the top 100.

Well. Let's see.

Hill and Hood are in. Hayward is our best player. Gobert is probably the top rim protector in the game and if Hill and Hood are in so is Favors. Question is could we have three top 30 guys??
 
Well. Let's see.

Hill and Hood are in. Hayward is our best player. Gobert is probably the top rim protector in the game and if Hill and Hood are in so is Favors. Question is could we have three top 30 guys??

I'm predicting:

Gobert: 40-45
Favors: 35-40
Hayward: 20-25
 
I love seeing that Hill was ranked above Teague! Ha ha ha to all of the Teague lovers on the board. Two way play and how a player makes a team better seem to have bearing in this ranking at least (as it does in mine). Also, I was shocked to see that Hood's finishing in the clutch was so low (24%!?!?!?!). The eye test would have suggested a much higher finishing rate. Maybe he just came on really strong for a stretch so it made us all believe that everything was going in?
 
30-50 came out... This list is bad. CJ McCollum is criminally underrated.
 
Gobert #33, all 5 starters in the top 100 is pretty good considering there r 150 starting spots in the NBA


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
2 spots ahead of Whiteside and 1 spot ahead of Dwight Howard

33. Rudy Gobert, C, Jazz



Put Rudy Gobert anywhere on God’s green Earth, and he’ll improve the local team’s defensive rating considerably. “Long” doesn’t even begin to describe the 7’1” Gobert, who has ranked in the top five in block percentage and the top six in rebound percentage in each of the last two seasons. At 24, and coming off of an incomplete season, Gobert (9.1 PPG, 11 RPG, 2.2 BPG) is already playing at an elite level and still has room for growth. That’s great news for the Jazz, who are poised to make a serious run up the West standings. While Gobert isn’t quite as nimble as other up-and-coming centers, he’s an absolute keeper: he skies for blocks, he fearlessly challenges plays at the rim regardless of the YouTube consequences, he aggressively contests and actively deters countless shots, and he can foil drives simply by sizing up a ball-handler. Thanks to the arrival of George Hill, plus a deeper and more flexible supporting cast, the Gobert-led Jazz can make a run at the NBA’s top defensive efficiency mark. With good health, Gobert should be firmly in the mix for All-Defensive Team and Defensive Player of the Year honors. (Last year: No. 39)
+ He allowed the lowest field goal percentage at the rim last season (per Nylon Calculus)
+ More than 80% of his field goal attempts came from within 2 feet last year
– He missed 21 games last season, including an extended stretch due to a knee injury
– He scored just 16 points all season in post-up situations (per Synergy Sports)
 
Is there really a difference between Hood and McCollum?

Hood is a year younger, better midrange, gets to the foul line at a higher ratio of FGA/FTA, and is taller/longer. I think Hood is going to be hte much better player. The only reason McCollum scores more points is because he takes 5 more shots per game. He averages 6 more points while taking 5 more shots, and that is with him having an insanely good year shooting the 3. If Hood ever approaches 40% shooting he will blow McCollum out of the water.
 
Is there really a difference between Hood and McCollum?

Hood is a year younger, better midrange, gets to the foul line at a higher ratio of FGA/FTA, and is taller/longer. I think Hood is going to be hte much better player. The only reason McCollum scores more points is because he takes 5 more shots per game. He averages 6 more points while taking 5 more shots, and that is with him having an insanely good year shooting the 3. If Hood ever approaches 40% shooting he will blow McCollum out of the water.

What is this "if" garbage?
 
Damn, actually kind of surprised Favors is going to be in the top 30.


Expected him to be like 31-35.

It's hard to properly evaluate from the macro level a very quiet player that very quietly produces on a mediocre/bad team in the smallest market in major pro sports.
 
Also surprised they rated DeRozan so low. I dont like his game, but 46 seems kind of disrespectful for averaging nearly 24 ppg on one of the better Eastern Conference teams.
 
Top