If all "ways" are labled "evolution" of course evolution can't help but be truth.
"so many different" =/= "all"
Real scientists don't claim "any movement is gravity" in the way cultist onebrow claims "any change is evolution."
Like your heroes, you quote-mine to smear. I said that in response to a comment about the fictitious notion of de-evolution. It is more precise to say that any change in the population as generations proceed is evolution.
The invisible force that causes a predictable and specific type of movement is labeled "gravity."
Other movement occurs through the influence/design of an outside force...
Nonsense. The other three fundamental forces also cause the movement of mass, with neither design nor influence.
So if we see an apple fall to the ground we don't have to insist that it was a random occurence for our observation to be considered scientific. We recognice the invisible force called "gravity" as a scientifically relevant explanation for certain movement.
Similarly, when we see a change in a population over generations, we don't have to insist that it was a random occurrence for our observation to be considered scientific. We recognize the invisible mechanic called "selection" as a scientifically relevant explanation for certain changes.
Back to your insistence that you couldn't possibly pick just one cultist story for how complex organs came into existence. Darwin claimed they came into existence in a specific way, "numerous successive, slight modifications,"...
Which modification came first, second, third, etc.? Did any appear at the same time? You can order a set of n items in n! ways (so, for 7 items, there are 5040 ways to order them). Even if you rule out 90% of the orders, that's still 50 to choose from, and we don't know which particular order is correct.