Zombie
Well-Known Member
You're missing a few important details in your hypothetical. In this scenario Jack Joe Jennifer and Jason were cheering on the touching, so they may not be truthful.So if I tell you that John Doe touched me 30 years ago, and that Jack, Joe, Jennifer, and Jason were there too, you’d believe me? That makes sense. Now what if Jack, Joe, Jennifer, and Jason all said it didn’t happen? Would you still believe me? Oh but wait! Jerry said that Julius told him about that story too. Ok, now that sounds more believable. Wait...what do you mean Julius says he knows nothing about it? That...hmmm. And I was calling people around the last few weeks because I wasn’t sure who did it? You would still believe me?
I don’t doubt somebody did something to Ramirez like what she is describing. But the best supporting evidence she has is a second hand story that the first hand denies. And that’s despite many names first hand witnesses. In any situation, legal or not, it isn’t enough.
Also lets say Jerry told me both the time and the place John touched you, and it just so happens so be the same time and place you told me it happenned.
This combined with the fact that false accusations are less likely than previously unreported true accusations means yeah, I'm going to believe you. Not to mention that not only did you tell me this about John, you put it in a sworn statement and asked to speak to the FBI about it.