Supreme Court Justice Kennedy to Retire

[One Brow]

Could you at least nail down the year if you were going to have to testify about it before Congress.

She did specify the year, and before she was even asked to testify before Congress (it was in the original Washington Post article).

When you wonder why some people don't take your opinions seriously, it's because you say something factually wrong like this, have the error pointed out to you in a clear way, and then come back and make the same error again the next day.

 

[DutchJazzer]

some people said why would ford lied. you got to beleive her.

https://www.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford 500.000+ reasons to lie. and more reasons coming every minute

 

[JazzGal]

So she knew in advance that there would be GoFundMe accounts and she figured this was a great way to make money? Yeah, that's convincing.

 

[Gameface]

She did specify the year, and before she was even asked to testify before Congress (it was in the original Washington Post article).

When you wonder why some people don't take your opinions seriously, it's because you say something factually wrong like this, have the error pointed out to you in a clear way, and then come back and make the same error again the next day.

Wait until he starts telling you what you think and won't for the life of him or you or the rest of us allow you to tell him it's not true.

 

[Red]

I agree no one group has complete control. But before the advent of the internet is was very possible to have significant control of information.

It was also, at least to some degree, and in some subjects, possible to recognize a consensus reality. Myself, I am struggling, and it is a hell of a struggle, to understand and really wrap my head around the meaning of living in a Post Truth era. I feel I need to understand this.

I used to tell people if they wanted to understand the modern world, they needed to understand that we live in the Age of Conspiracy Theories. See all those capital letters? It's because I thought I had stumbled on an important insight, and just as historians speak of an Age of Enlightenment, I thought my insight was a good way to define an age, and defining an age requires capitalizing the description. Lol. Of course, it wasn't really my insight. But I did think it was as good a way as any to decribe the age I lived in.

There is still truth in that observation, methinks, but now it's back to the drawing board for me. The Post Truth Era. Post Truth is dangerous to democracy. I know that much, I think, but I have a long way to go to really understand, and I am not at all sure I am up to the task.

Make fun all you want, doesn't matter.

For the record, I am not making fun of you.

 

[Jonah]

It’s over. Flake and Collins now have the cover they needed. Kavanaugh will be confirmed this weekend and the ramifications of having a mini-Trump on the Supreme Court will be felt for 20 to 30 years.

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

Speaking for myself the details are pretty vague. I could probably just call your mom and ask her how it went though at least.

(Hopefully i didnt offend you as it wasnt my intention. I just couldnt resist)

Hmm. Your plan wouldn't work. She doesn't answer her phone anymore.

 

[♪alt13]

Do the reports that she was recently calling classmates to see if they could help her remember whether it was Brett or someone else who pulled his pants down matter to anyone?
I could figure these out precisely and easily.[/QUOTE]

Yeah that's the point dip ****. You can't remember off the top of your head the date and time of an emotional experience. It doesn't mean it didn't happen. It means that most people don't check a clock and calendar in the midst of an emotional experience. That's not what sticks. Do you just play dumb or should I legitimately feel bad for you?

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

She did specify the year, and before she was even asked to testify before Congress (it was in the original Washington Post article).

When you wonder why some people don't take your opinions seriously, it's because you say something factually wrong like this, have the error pointed out to you in a clear way, and then come back and make the same error again the next day.

She did not specify the year. She said she wasn't sure. In her sworn testimony she said maybe they could check Safeway's personnel records because it was the same summer that Mark Judge worked there. She knows that because she recalls an uncomfortable encounter when she ran into him there and he was no longer friendly like he used to be. She seemed to imply that he was embarrassed.

Don't give me a lecture when you don't know what you are talking about.

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

Yeah that's the point dip ****. You can't remember off the top of your head the date and time of an emotional experience. It doesn't mean it didn't happen. It means that most people don't check a clock and calendar in the midst of an emotional experience. That's not what sticks. Do you just play dumb or should I legitimately feel bad for you?

Calling people names doesn't make your argument more impressive. You seem to have misread what I wrote, anyway. There are reports that she was calling people up asking if they remembered if it was Brett who did this, because she couldn't remember whether it was him or not. Let that sink in. She brought an accusation of this weight out and was uncertain whether she was accusing the right guy.
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/24/deborah-ramirez-kavanaugh-accuser/

 

[Joe Bagadonuts]

Yeah that's the point dip ****. You can't remember off the top of your head the date and time of an emotional experience. It doesn't mean it didn't happen. It means that most people don't check a clock and calendar in the midst of an emotional experience. That's not what sticks. Do you just play dumb or should I legitimately feel bad for you?

Since you bunged up the quote on your reply it was difficult to tell which part of my quote you were responding to. If it was my last line then I'd like to know why you think this information has to come off the top of your head. Hasn't Dr. Ford had any time to think about/research the claim she is making? If I needed to tell the country about my grandparent's deaths the first thing I'd do is a little research to remind myself of the facts.

 

[♪alt13]

Calling people names doesn't make your argument more impressive. You seem to have misread what I wrote, anyway. There are reports that she was calling people up asking if they remembered if it was Brett who did this, because she couldn't remember whether it was him or not. Let that sink in. She brought an accusation of this weight out and was uncertain whether she was accusing the right guy.
https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/24/deborah-ramirez-kavanaugh-accuser/

Again you are dumb

RAMIREZ is a different person than FORD

Also a different circumstance. You are drunk somebody puts their penis in your face and walks away. It is likely you will need the help of your fellow party goers to identify that person. Honestly it speaks to her credibility. If she just wanted to destroy him she wouldn't have bothered to ask people "Remember that guy who forced his dick in my face when I was drunk, was that Brett or someone else?"