What's new

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

Your last two posts prove my pt. Who wants to read your line by line rebuttals? How does that help anyone? You find it “informative” but no one else does. And as I’ve done to other trolls, I’ve expressed my pt, I’ll disengage, and now block you. I’m sure you’ll scream into the void and fill this site with pages and pages more drivel but I’ll never see it.
At last one of the trolls has me on ignore, and it's the one I predicted.
 
At last one of the trolls has me on ignore, and it's the one I predicted.
Wait, doesn't using the ignore function exclude the possibility that they are a troll? So that settles it then, they're evil.
 
I will say that I find it quite the coincidence that of all the people of posting on Jazzfanz, the three who are taking an issue with a movie with a message against the sexualization of children are Gameface, Gandalfe, and One Brow. For the lurkers who do not get the connection, each of those three raised children in such a way that their children developed sexual dysphoria. Those three are the ones attacking this movie forwarding an anti-sexualization of children narrative. I find that to be quite the coincidence.
Here's your final troll test. A challenge for you, easily laid out. A chance for you to clarify what you mean exactly with this post. Take it out of the realm of implication and insinuation and just say what you are saying. Especially this part...

each of those three raised children in such a way that their children developed sexual dysphoria. Those three are the ones attacking this movie forwarding an anti-sexualization of children narrative. I find that to be quite the coincidence.

So put up, express EXACTLY what you mean by this, make it unequivocally clear to everyone, or delete your account, how about that? There, I made it easy for you to dispel our "imagination".

By the way this isn't the only post this was insinuated, just the most succinct.

So?
 
Here's your final troll test. A challenge for you, easily laid out. A chance for you to clarify what you mean exactly with this post. Take it out of the realm of implication and insinuation and just say what you are saying. Especially this part...



So put up, express EXACTLY what you mean by this, make it unequivocally clear to everyone, or delete your account, how about that? There, I made it easy for you to dispel our "imagination".

By the way this isn't the only post this was insinuated, just the most succinct.

So?
I wonder if they could even define sexual dysphoria? Probably not, because that's not actually a thing, at least not clinically.
 
express EXACTLY what you mean by this, make it unequivocally clear to everyone
It means exactly what I wrote. One Brow, Gameface, and Gandalfe share a commonality in that all three have raised non-gender-conforming children. One Brow, Gameface, and Gandalfe were the only ones on this board opposing a favorable depiction of the movie when as far as I could tell, not a single one of them had even seen the movie. There did seem to be something that resonated with all three that prompted all three and only those three to jump on the favorable depiction of a movie none of them had seen. This movie with a message against the sexualization of children, and those promoting the movie, seemed to prompt a defensive response. It was a coincidence that I found interesting.
 
It means exactly what I wrote. One Brow, Gameface, and Gandalfe share a commonality in that all three have raised non-gender-conforming children. One Brow, Gameface, and Gandalfe were the only ones on this board opposing a favorable depiction of the movie when as far as I could tell, not a single one of them had even seen the movie. There did seem to be something that resonated with all three that prompted all three and only those three to jump on the favorable depiction of a movie none of them had seen. This movie with a message against the sexualization of children, and those promoting the movie, seemed to prompt a defensive response. It was a coincidence that I found interesting.
Welcome to the new Jazzfanz.com everyone!
 
It means exactly what I wrote. One Brow, Gameface, and Gandalfe share a commonality in that all three have raised non-gender-conforming children. One Brow, Gameface, and Gandalfe were the only ones on this board opposing a favorable depiction of the movie when as far as I could tell, not a single one of them had even seen the movie. There did seem to be something that resonated with all three that prompted all three and only those three to jump on the favorable depiction of a movie none of them had seen. This movie with a message against the sexualization of children, and those promoting the movie, seemed to prompt a defensive response. It was a coincidence that I found interesting.
It strikes me as cowardly that you would make an implication that anybody with a brain can see, and then play the plausible deniability card instead of stating clearly what you mean when pressed for clarity.
 
There is a difference between maintaining the integrity of an Olympic event that could result in a world record ... I think it is fine if college level ...

What you wrote before today was significantly more hard line.

Sports in schools or that are subsidized by any government funds should be focused on teaching kids lessons or encouraging them to live more active healthy lives. ... That should be the primary point of taxpayer funded sports programs

Olympic events and college level sports are both subsidized by government funds.
 
What you wrote before today was significantly more hard line.



Olympic events and college level sports are both subsidized by government funds.
My point has not changed. Not even a little bit.
 
Back
Top