What's new
By:

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

if even one feels hopeful about humanity and the future all you need to do is come here and read these miserable as **** pages. Fixed.
 
fishonjazz said:
Trump literally tells his voters he doesnt care about them. He only wants their votes.
He calls them dumb by saying how he loves the uneducated.
He calls them sheep by saying they would support him even if he murdered someone. (Also kind of sheep like to choose suicide over Biden. Maybe suicide by drinking some Kool aid?)



Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

like the time he told them all he didn't care if they froze to death, just get out and vote first lol
 
Douchebag K said:
lol no need to be a **** mate.

Don't find his case all that interesting and nobody was disputing the law around it.

See ... look at each item on it's merits ya ??
Click to expand...
He was a first time offender and non violent and got tried for a felony for something that no one else ever gets tried on felony for by a judge trump appointed. If trump were the defendant you would be freaking out right now

Also, it made you raise your eyebrows how quickly the jury reached the verdict in the trump case and this jury was even quicker.

Your issue with the trump trial wasn't how interesting or uninteresting it was or wasn't. Until now apparently.

I'm super shocked (sarcasm) you have no issue with this trial.

You say no one was disputing the law in this case but I posted a bunch of quotes from literal trumpers (gaetz, Graham, etc) who had an issue with this trial and how the law was used. You on the other hand? All good with this trial of course. The pattern continues

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
fishonjazz said:
He was a first time offender and non violent and got tried for a felony for something that no one else ever gets tried on felony for by a judge trump appointed. If trump were the defendant you would be freaking out right now

Also, it made you raise your eyebrows how quickly the jury reached the verdict in the trump case and this jury was even quicker.

Your issue with the trump trial wasn't how interesting or uninteresting it was or wasn't. Until now apparently.

I'm super shocked (sarcasm) you have no issue with this trial.

You say no one was disputing the law in this case but I posted a bunch of quotes from literal trumpers (gaetz, Graham, etc) who had an issue with this trial and how the law was used. You on the other hand? All good with this trial of course. The pattern continues

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

lol. Mate you’re really hung up on this whole thing which is really weird. In this thread you sound like Thriller, I’m kinda stunned that where this is concerned you’ve become arrogant enough to try to put words into someone else’s mouth and assume that the way you see things is 100 % correct.

I’m sure you’ll just reiterate what you think and what you assert I think and why you’re right. … enjoy. I really don’t care.
 
Douchebag K said:
lol. Mate you’re really hung up on this whole thing which is really weird. In this thread you sound like Thriller, I’m kinda stunned that where this is concerned you’ve become arrogant enough to try to put words into someone else’s mouth and assume that the way you see things is 100 % correct.

I’m sure you’ll just reiterate what you think and what you assert I think and why you’re right. … enjoy. I really don’t care.
Click to expand...
Thing is it would be really easy for you just say you think this is a politically motivated farce of a trial. Just like you did with trump. Just so weird that you wont though. I mean even trumps biggest supporters think it was a farce. Literally millions of illegal drug users buy guns in america every year and fill out the form to buy a gun and say that they dont use illegal drugs. This is a non violent first offender doing what millions of americans do every year who is being prosecuted for a felony and having his name drug through the mud. If he were not the presidents son then nothing would be happening to him legally/criminally.

Funny thing is that both trump and hunter are basically in trouble for doing the same thing. Filling out info incorrectly/lying. The main difference in the two cases is that one of them (hunter) did what millions of americans do all the time and has no effect on any of our lives whatsoever. The gun he bought was never used to hurt anyone or to commit any crime. The other one (trump) did something that no other americans do/did (cheat on his wife with pornstar and pay her to keep quiet and lie about the payment and kill any stories from the media about the affair in order to help him become the president of the US) and it affected billions of people across the entire world.

You have beef with trumps prosecution, the one whose crime actually mattered and affected a huge amount of people, but have no beef with hunters prosecution. The one whose crime literally had no affect on anyone whatsoever. Its so weird.

Also, there is partisan judge presiding over a trump trial, one that you have said you think is actually a big deal and important, in florida who isn't allowing the trial to actually take place. Not a peep from you.
 
Last edited:
fishonjazz said:
Troll gonna troll.
I think I was molested isn't the same as my father molested me.

She thinks she might have been molested. She isn't sure. AL is sure though. She doesn't say who she might have been molested by. AL knows however.
But, trolls gonna troll.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Remember, the cult members operate entirely in the realm of imagination.
 
fishonjazz said:
Thing is it would be really easy for you just say you think this is a politically motivated farce of a trial. Just like you did with trump. Just so weird that you wont though. I mean even trumps biggest supporters think it was a farce. Literally millions of illegal drug users buy guns in america every year and fill out the form to buy a gun and say that they dont use illegal drugs. This is a non violent first offender doing what millions of americans do every year who is being prosecuted for a felony and having his name drug through the mud. If he were not the presidents son then nothing would be happening to him legally/criminally.
Click to expand...
Your observation is spot on but then your brain seems to stop working. Yes, the Hunter Biden trial was a politically motivated farce. If he were not the president's son then nothing would be happening to him legally/criminally. So why is it happening? It isn't because conservatives are out to get Hunter because conservatives aren't running anything and don't have that kind of pull. Biden's DOJ is doing this. Why?

It is because everybody knows the real crime is selling political influence, of being Joe Biden's bag man. That is why Hunter Biden should be locked up, not some piddly form. Biden's DOJ keeps making the gun form crime the face of the prosecution because it is the farthest away from Joe Biden. First they took a plea deal on the gun form crime that contained a clause buried in a diversion agreement that excused unrelated tax crimes. We can't have anyone looking in to the tax crimes because that income draws ties to Joe Biden. The judge noticed the buried clause and blew up the deal.

Then they went to trial, and again it is the silly gun form violation. You watch. The tax crimes will not move forward, and there will be nothing on the real crime of selling political influence / corruption. On his way out of office, Joe Biden will pardon his son and that pardon will be written in a way that Hunter can't be investigated for the tax crimes or anything else. We can't have anyone looking in to the tax crimes because that income draws ties to Joe Biden.
 
fishonjazz said:
Ya and then if gas prices don't drop drastically and inflation doesn't drop drastically and all wars don't end...... What then?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
His cult will continue to praise him and the economy. Facts don’t matter to his followers, feeling aggrieved is the only thing that matters. If Trump wins, overnight republicans will change their views on the economy, inflation, crime, etc.

So I didnt post thinking that his followers would change their views. He literally steals from them and they continue to open their pockets for him. But if he wins I do hope that his followers get his rancid tax policy and economics damn good and hard.

For too long republicans have had to rely on Democrats to be the adults in the room. Let the GOP run this country and its economic system into the ground by deporting millions of immigrants, raising taxes, getting rid of social security, and going on default. Give Trump’s billionaire buddies more money. Let him be a dictator until he croaks. Elect clowns expect a circus.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
fishonjazz said:
Thing is it would be really easy for you just say you think this is a politically motivated farce of a trial. Just like you did with trump. Just so weird that you wont though. I mean even trumps biggest supporters think it was a farce. Literally millions of illegal drug users buy guns in america every year and fill out the form to buy a gun and say that they dont use illegal drugs. This is a non violent first offender doing what millions of americans do every year who is being prosecuted for a felony and having his name drug through the mud. If he were not the presidents son then nothing would be happening to him legally/criminally.

Funny thing is that both trump and hunter are basically in trouble for doing the same thing. Filling out info incorrectly/lying. The main difference in the two cases is that one of them (hunter) did what millions of americans do all the time and has no effect on any of our lives whatsoever. The gun he bought was never used to hurt anyone or to commit any crime. The other one (trump) did something that no other americans do/did (cheat on his wife with pornstar and pay her to keep quiet and lie about the payment and kill any stories from the media about the affair in order to help him become the president of the US) and it affected billions of people across the entire world.

You have beef with trumps prosecution, the one whose crime actually mattered and affected a huge amount of people, but have no beef with hunters prosecution. The one whose crime literally had no affect on anyone whatsoever. Its so weird.

Also, there is partisan judge presiding over a trump trial, one that you have said you think is actually a big deal and important, in florida who isn't allowing the trial to actually take place. Not a peep from you.
Click to expand...

dunno man One of these was about a high level loser who was the past and by some bizarre happenings likely the future President of the United States that was all over the news here. The other is about a low level loser who is irrelevant and barely got a mention so i don't care. I dunno how that's so hard to understand.

Are you OK dude ? You seem so wound up and pissy these days
 
so seriously at what point will Biden be yanked and someone who can speak English and offer a better option to vote for be nominated ?? When is it too late ?? This ******** on both sides just keeps getting worse, why won't anyone nominate someone decent, they'd runaway with the vote surely
 
Douchebag K said:
so seriously at what point will Biden be yanked and someone who can speak English and offer a better option to vote for be nominated ?? When is it too late ?? This ******** on both sides just keeps getting worse, why won't anyone nominate someone decent, they'd runaway with the vote surely
Click to expand...
I understand that you don’t know much about our system. Biden is the nominee. There’s no time to run a primary at this point. Nor would the primary be helpful to anyone but Trump. Kamala Harris would be the nominee and her chance of winning is far lower than Biden’s. Even if you had time to run the primary before party conventions this summer, you’d have an ugly primary that again, would only benefit Trump. I mean, just imagine Gretchen Whittmer or Josh Shapiro doing hits on Harris. Or Harris attempting to woo the far left by doing hits on Gaza on Shapiro. It just wouldn’t be beneficial. Let the candidates fight it out over the next few years and during a longer primary where the stakes aren’t so high.

I don’t know why people are so down on Biden. He’s doing a great job, the economy is only getting better, inflation is lower, and many voters will return to the coalition to beat Trump. He’ll be fine against Trump. Sure, wish he was much younger and didn’t have a stutter. But he’s fine. I think he’s going to win this fall and it won’t be that close. Trump sucks.

Then in 2028 the DNC can have an ugly primary to fight for the nomination.
 
Douchebag K said:
so seriously at what point will Biden be yanked and someone who can speak English and offer a better option to vote for be nominated ?? When is it too late ?? This ******** on both sides just keeps getting worse, why won't anyone nominate someone decent, they'd runaway with the vote surely
Click to expand...
Why don’t you suggest the GOP find a replacement for Trump? After all, he was the one who was recently found guilty of felony crimes. It’s interesting how you always “error” in attacking the left. For being a “nonpartisan neutral observer” you sure help Trump out a lot. Have you ever asked for Trump to be replaced?
 
Douchebag K said:
dunno man One of these was about a high level loser who was the past and by some bizarre happenings likely the future President of the United States that was all over the news here. The other is about a low level loser who is irrelevant and barely got a mention so i don't care. I dunno how that's so hard to understand.

Are you OK dude ? You seem so wound up and pissy these days
Click to expand...
But now that you know you can have an opinion on it. Which you seem very willing to share in defense of trump and to attack the justice system for prosecuting trump but for some reason cant see the issue in the prosecution of hunter. Its strange bro. Im wondering if you are ok.
 
The Thriller said:
Why don’t you suggest the GOP find a replacement for Trump? After all, he was the one who was recently found guilty of felony crimes. It’s interesting how you always “error” in attacking the left. For being a “nonpartisan neutral observer” you sure help Trump out a lot. Have you ever asked for Trump to be replaced?
Click to expand...
Its kind of a pattern. The dems should replace Biden. The winner of the last election and current president. But the GOP shouldn't replace trump. The loser of the last election, convicted felon scumbag who tried to overturn our election and still has a bunch of indictments upcoming. The pattern continues.
 

Before the 1960s, it was really hard to get divorced in America.

Typically, the only way to do it was to convince a judge that your spouse had committed some form of wrongdoing, like adultery, abandonment, or “cruelty” (that is, abuse). This could be difficult: “Even if you could prove you had been hit, that didn’t necessarily mean it rose to the level of cruelty that justified a divorce,” said Marcia Zug, a family law professor at the University of South Carolina.

Then came a revolution: In 1969, then-Gov. Ronald Reagan of California (who was himself divorced) signed the nation’s first no-fault divorce law, allowing people to end their marriages without proving they’d been wronged. The move was a recognition that “people were going to get out of marriages,” Zug said, and gave them a way to do that without resorting to subterfuge. Similar laws soon swept the country, and rates of domestic violence and spousal murder began to drop as people — especially women — gained more freedom to leave dangerous situations.

Today, however, a counter-revolution is brewing: Conservative commentators and lawmakers are calling for an end to no-fault divorce, arguing that it has harmed men and even destroyed the fabric of society. Oklahoma state Sen. Dusty Deevers, for example, introduced a bill in January to ban his state’s version of no-fault divorce. The Texas Republican Party added a call to end the practice to its 2022 platform (the plank is preserved in the 2024 version). Federal lawmakers like Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and House Speaker Mike Johnson, as well as former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson, have spoken out in favor of tightening divorce laws.

If this sounds outlandish or like easily dismissed political posturing — surely Republicans don’t want to turn back the clock on marital law more than 50 years — it’s worth looking back at, say, how rhetorical attacks on abortion, birth control, and IVF have become reality.

And that will cause huge problems, especially for anyone experiencing abuse. “Any barrier to divorce is a really big challenge for survivors,” said Marium Durrani, vice president of policy at the National Domestic Violence Hotline. “What it really ends up doing is prolonging their forced entanglement with an abusive partner.”

In the wake of the Dobbs decision, divorce is just one of many areas of family law that conservative policymakers see an opportunity to rewrite. “We’ve now gotten to the point where things that weren’t on the table are on the table,” Zug said. “Fringe ideas are becoming much more mainstream.”

It’s worth noting that though the no-fault laws initially led to spikes in divorce, rates then began to drop, and reached a 50-year low in 2019.

No-fault divorce can be easier on children, who don’t have to experience their parents facing each other in a trial, experts say. Research suggests that allowing such divorces increased women’s power in marriages and even reduced women’s suicide rates. A return to the old ways would turn back the clock on this progress, scholars say.

“We know exactly what happens when people can’t get out of very unhappy marriages,” Zug said. “There’s much higher incidences of domestic abuse and spousal murder.”

Divorce is extremely common — more than 670,000 American couples split in 2022 alone. Any rollback to no-fault divorce would likely be politically unpopular, even in red states (some of which have higher divorce rates than the national average).

But perhaps emboldened by their victory in overturning Roe v. Wade, social conservatives have gone after other popular targets in recent months, from birth control to IVF. The drive to increase restrictions on divorce is part of the same movement, Zug said — an effort to re-entrench “conservative family values,” incentivize heterosexual marriage and childbearing, and disempower women. “They are all connected,” Zug said.
 
fishonjazz said:
Its kind of a pattern. The dems should replace Biden. The winner of the last election and current president. But the GOP shouldn't replace trump. The loser of the last election, convicted felon scumbag who tried to overturn our election and still has a bunch of indictments upcoming. The pattern continues.
Click to expand...

you know there's no chance to replace Trump because the Republicans heads are so far up his arse they'll never do it yeah ?? which is why i don't mention it. It's weird because there seemed to be quite a few other options for them. I actually still have hope that the Democrats will wake up and replace Biden to offer something decent and appealing. i think there's still a good chance that will happen which is why i do mention it, Not hard to understand unless you're just so hell bent on thinking Biden is a good option. I wouldn't vote for either of those clowns in a blue fit.

And my point overall is .. the world is laughing at you Trump is .. well all that he is and it beggars belief that he might get back in, but outside the US Biden is openly mocked and laughed at and it's also hard to fathom that he's being offered as the other choice.

but yeah .. pAtTErn
 
Douchebag K said:
you know there's no chance to replace Trump because the Republicans heads are so far up his arse they'll never do it yeah ?? which is why i don't mention it. It's weird because there seemed to be quite a few other options for them. I actually still have hope that the Democrats will wake up and replace Biden to offer something decent and appealing. i think there's still a good chance that will happen which is why i do mention it, Not hard to understand unless you're just so hell bent on thinking Biden is a good option. I wouldn't vote for either of those clowns in a blue fit.

And my point overall is .. the world is laughing at you Trump is .. well all that he is and it beggars belief that he might get back in, but outside the US Biden is openly mocked and laughed at and it's also hard to fathom that he's being offered as the other choice.

but yeah .. pAtTErn
Click to expand...
One is the winner of the previous election and current president. You should look it up and let me know the last time that the current president didn't run in the next election after their first term.
I'm guessing it's never happened before.
You can think something that hasn't ever happened before should happen but it just won't so might as well give that hope up. I did.

It's also very rare that the loser of an election is the nominee again (though this has probably happened before)

In other words it makes complete sense that Biden would be the nominee again.

It's bat **** insane that trump would be the nominee


Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top