jom2003
Well-Known Member
Remember when we had that? Of course, our guys couldn’t shoot well except for Hayward.
No, I doubt Gasol would be the clear cut winner of that matchup had he been 6'8. He was better than Booz but size disparity has a lot to do with that.Gasol beat us because Gasol was better than Boozer/Okur (and you know, having ****ing Kobe). IF Gasol somehow shrunk to 6'8, he'd still be better than those players.
It's not about size/athleticism, it's about who is better. Yes, size/athleticism contributes to that, but it's not black/white that you just get more size/athletic and you're automatically better.
Of course it's not black and white if you are comparing the two players with relatively the same size and physical profile, then the player with better skill would be the better player overall. Or if you are just in a different league when it comes to basketball skill it might make up for your lack of size and athleticism. But overall as a team you simply need enough size and athleticism on the floor for championship contention. Like Raptors made up for their undersized backcourt of Lowry/Vanvleet with Kawhi/Siakam/Gasol. You can't win with more than 3 undersized non athletes.