Lakers_Slapper
Well-Known Member
With Exum coming off the bench, it gives him time to develop and take his time getting comfortable. Keep in mind how young he is.
Totally agree with this. I think it would've a mistake to start exum at the 2. He's a point guard. I think more damage would be done to him there than coming off the bench this season.
Exum on the bench is flat out a waste of time. He is the first franchise player the Jazz have drafted in 9 years, 29 years if you don't count Deron as franchise player material.
Exum is the future, Burke is not. In fact I'd be shocked if Burke is still on the team in 3-4 years. He'll probably be in Milwaulkee or something playing the same role Brandon Jennings did there.
I disagree with the idea that Exum on the bench is going to make him a better player. Him playing, and succeeding and failing, against the best competition is going to make him a better player. Superstars don't get to be superstars by playing with and against scrubs. If you want to be the best you've got to beat the best.
Forget Burke. Focus on Exum.
He's not ready physically for starter's minutes on a night-by-night basis.
Or skill level since he can't take it to the rim or shoot off the dribble, nor does he threaten too.
I love of how Quin is doing a solid job of developing Exum by playing him an average of 2.25 less mpg in his last 8 games compared to his first 8 games. After all, Exum's minutes are expected to decrease as the season progresses.
I also love how Quin does a solid job of developing Exum by capping his minutes no matter how well he plays and benching him if he makes mistakes. A very rewarding system to play for.
I also love how Quin does a solid job of developing Exum by never giving him any minutes with all of the starting four (Burks, Hayward, Kanter, Favors) on the floor at the same time. Playing with bench players, is, of course, the same thing.
I think this is an extremely flawed way of thinking. In today's NBA there is way more depth at PG than SG. It may end up being that it is in our best interest to find a PG (or keep Burke if he improves) and make Exum the starting 2-guard of the future. Kobe was the starting 2-guard for LA and Derek Fisher was the starting PG. Who created more offense? Stop getting stuck on position labels and look how the offense is run. Crazy how close-minded even the strongest of NBA fans can be when it comes to this.
Hayward is the starting SF, but often times is our PG. In Quin's offense wings who are capable get to create offense much like a traditional PG would.
Clearly, from your comment, you agree that the distinction between "Exum the PG" vs "Exum the SG" is dependent on what type of player he plays next to in the backcourt. I tend to think that it would be to the Jazz's advantage that that player is a shooter that can guard 2s. A shooter because let's face it Exum is going to need help spreading the floor. A guy that can guard 2's because Exum has the speed to guard the quickest players and the length to give him an advantage.
If he plays next to a facilitator that needs to guard the shortest player(Trey Burke)then the length advantage vanishes and his offensive game is to a large degree made redundant because Exum is a facilitator first and a scorer second.
Having extra length in the backcourt without compromising speed is a clear advantage. Why negate that advantage?
I've seen him post up regularly in U18 competitions. He might have it in his repertoire(some low post scoring and great passing from the low post) but he doesn't have the strength against this level of opposition to be effective doing it. This strength thing seems to be a recurring thing with so much of his game - driving and finishing around the rim, post up, getting into sets when pressured(this one may have more to do with his handle, but strength plays a role too), going through screens and defending the PnR. I really hope he spends next summer in the gym trying to improve his body.
Clearly, from your comment, you agree that the distinction between "Exum the PG" vs "Exum the SG" is dependent on what type of player he plays next to in the backcourt. I tend to think that it would be to the Jazz's advantage that that player is a shooter that can guard 2s. A shooter because let's face it Exum is going to need help spreading the floor. A guy that can guard 2's because Exum has the speed to guard the quickest players and the length to give him an advantage.
If he plays next to a facilitator that needs to guard the shortest player(Trey Burke)then the length advantage vanishes and his offensive game is to a large degree made redundant because Exum is a facilitator first and a scorer second.
Having extra length in the backcourt without compromising speed is a clear advantage. Why negate that advantage?