I think the Indiana game showed how we respond when the long ball isn't falling. We attacked, got good inside looks, and kept shooting. The ship kind of corrected itself. But he is right about our free throw rate, it is abysmal. We need to have that kind of plan as a back up while we get the 3 ball cooking again.Excellent content. I co-sign this ****. —With more love for Bojan, though, who is the kind of mid-range bucket-getter than he seems to wonder if we’ll need during stretches where the deep shots aren’t falling.
So one of his concerns is exactly what many of us have been harping on: lack of a wing defender for the bigger wings in the league. This will come back to bite us, and I think as a result we will end up in pure shoot-outs against teams with these players, especially in the playoffs. Hopefully our team D can be dialed in very tightly by then so we can defend this by committee but he raises a good point there for sure.
Interesting point, so I went and looked up some thingsI think the Indiana game showed how we respond when the long ball isn't falling. We attacked, got good inside looks, and kept shooting. The ship kind of corrected itself. But he is right about our free throw rate, it is abysmal. We need to have that kind of plan as a back up while we get the 3 ball cooking again.
I’d speculate that increased free throws means we’re either moving away from our game that works (3s) or the 3 ball isn’t falling, pushing us into trying to get to the rim more and being less efficient.Interesting point, so I went and looked up some things
- Jazz FT-rate and FT/game are right in the middle of league average (17th & 14th respectively)
- Some of the Jazz's worst 3-point % games were also those with the most FT taken (so they do at least sometimes adjust, it seems)
- 3 of the Jazz's top-5 FT-taking games were among the team's 5 losses (the other two losses were the very worst FT-taking game, as well as one somewhere in the middle as far as FTs taken) -- that surprised me a bit; FTs taken does not seem to be an indicator for success for the Jazz (small sample size issues of course)
To start, I did really enjoy the video myself.I agree with almost all of what he said but sorry, we’re better than the ****ing Sixers. After Embiid, Simmons and Harris leave a lot to be desired. And they don’t have much depth.
And the Western Conference has been the (much) superior conference almost every year for the past 15 years or more.To start, I did really enjoy the video myself.
I heard but didn't think about it until your comment made me think about it... to further add about PHI.
They have proved WAY less and have had more and bigger disappointments then the Jazz and they are getting a pass.
The WHY? Well I'd be happy if people would be straight up honest as to why. My guesses are in no particular order East coast bias, big market bias and the previous 2 feed into this one bigger name recognition/bigger stars and lastly I could even understand being told because PHI is in the East and it's an easier path to the Finals. Those are all fine and I get it just be honest with it up front, I'll admit I have a West coast bias cause we play those teams more so I see them and know them better.
I think that is valid. It is something we need to be able to do if we are not hitting the 3. We need to find other ways to win, like we did against Indy. That puts us next-level.I’d speculate that increased free throws means we’re either moving away from our game that works (3s) or the 3 ball isn’t falling, pushing us into trying to get to the rim more and being less efficient.
I don’t know that those stats negate that, though. It’s just showing that when our three isn’t falling that we’re shooting more FTs, but that we’re not performing as well. I think any metric will show you preforming worse on plan B than metrics measuring you implementing plan A.I think that is valid. It is something we need to be able to do if we are not hitting the 3. We need to find other ways to win, like we did against Indy. That puts us next-level.
I am not saying they negate it, really that I am not surprised by it because when our plan A isn't working we have to fall back on plan B, which generates those stats. But if we can figure out how to consistently pull out the tough games requiring plan B that pushes us to another level.I don’t know that those stats negate that, though. It’s just showing that when our three isn’t falling that we’re shooting more FTs, but that we’re not performing as well. I think any metric will show you preforming worse on plan B than metrics measuring you implementing plan A.
God help the media if we go 8-0 or 7-1 during this stretch. They will have to come up with new reasons why the Jazz are not contenders.
I think our team d and depth of legit scorers could make up for that. If Royce gets into foul trouble though, that could be problematic.