A
Agoxlea
Guest
If it was a 3 way tie with 2 teams they beat, they would win the tie break.
Hope this helps.
Thanks, but UCLA beat ASU. Utah beat UCLA. ASU beat Utah. Hope that helps.
If it was a 3 way tie with 2 teams they beat, they would win the tie break.
Hope this helps.
Thanks, but UCLA beat ASU. Utah beat UCLA. ASU beat Utah. Hope that helps.
Three or More Teams:
The following procedures will only be used to eliminate all but two teams, at which point the two-team tie-breaking procedure will be applied.
1.Head-to-head (best record in games among the tied teams).
2.Record in games played within the division.
3.Record against the next highest placed team in the division (based on record in all Conference games, both divisional and cross-divisional), proceeding through the division.
4.Record in common Conference games.
5.Highest BCS Ranking following the last weekend of regular-season games.
https://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/28838/pac-12-tiebreakers
After that the 2 team tie-break rules would apply.
Hope this helps even more.
It eliminates UCLA. Then ASU wins the head to head tiebreaker with Utah.That's all I was looking for. Any idea which team this eliminates? I'm assuming Utah which means UCLA wins south?
I think it's awesome that a BYU fan played the "Utes suck at basketball" card in a football thread. If you've got to go that far off of topic to try and enhance your point, perhaps you need to realize that the point you're tyring to make is complete and utter ********.
Utah is in 3rd right now and I'm willing to bet they finish higher than that, if you're willing to put your money where your mouth is.Utah, not first, not second, NOT THIRD, but fourth in the Pac 12. South!
I smell the roses.
Utah is in 3rd right now and I'm willing to bet they finish higher than that, if you're willing to put your money where your mouth is.
We're not the only ones not counting USC, the NCAA (and PAC 12) isn't counting them either. ASU is in first place right now, even though USC has a better record.Oh, we're not counting USC now. I see.
We're not the only ones not counting USC, the NCAA (and PAC 12) isn't counting them either. ASU is in first place right now, even though USC has a better record.
Yeah they are, my mistake.False. UCLA's ahead of ASU.
Yeah they are, my mistake.
So then Utah just blew out the current division leader. Awesome.
No, that is not true.By the way, regarding your response to my earlier post, make no mistake, Utah is 4th, not 3rd in their half of the conference. Are they 4th as far as the postseason goes, sure, but USC is not NOT playing games. The games they play matter. They count toward conference recordm, and ultimately, what place each team finishes in in conference. So are they third as far as bowl eligible team goes, yes, yes they are. Are they the third worst team according to record in their half of the conference? Even moreso.
Utah, not first, not second, NOT THIRD, but fourth in the Pac 12. South!
I smell the roses.
No, that is not true.
Utah has the second best overall record in their division right now. Only USC has a better record. Utah has a better overall record than UCLA, and beat them head to head.
If you are saying UCLA is ahead of Utah right now, you must be talking about division standings. And in those division standings, USC does not count.
Funny. I wonder why ESPN places them in the fourth in the standings on their website then.
BYU lost to Utah 54-10 on the last play of the game. I like playing this.
Funny. I wonder why ESPN places them in fourth in the standings on their website then.
Alphabetical order?