Utes 2011 Football Discussion
- Thread starter prodigy
- Start date
SaltyDawg
Well-Known Member
Think about it man... Someone goes out of their way to sneak in some beer. Obviously getting anymore than a few beers in is extremely difficult to do without getting caught.
I think I recall you saying you used to drink beer, so you probably already know that 2 or 3 beers will almost certainly be gone before the end of a 3 hour game.
And in the event someone is drunk enough to do it and still has beer left, so they actually pour beer on the Hall family... Someone, at least ONE person is going to come forward as a witness and help security track them down. Heck, someone in the Hall family would probably see the perpetrator and assist security in their apprehension.
Or we could go with Hall's version. In a crowd of about 50,000 people, with several thousand BYU fans in the mix, not one person saw anyone pouring beer all over some family members of the BYU QB, even though beer is banned from the stadium and would have needed to be snuck in, likely 3 hours prior, and then somehow not drank during this huge game, and security all around...
Favors Flave
Well-Known Member
LOL, TroutBum neg repped me for the same thing. How funny! Now you know what it was like when Utah fans never heard the ending of Harline is still open and George is still running!
According to your sig, 54-10 is the new 1984, but that's really not the case. 1984 happened forever ago and while your season was impressive, the national championship win wasn't against a 6-5 team! 54-10 happened last year! You got **** on. No way of spinning it, 44 points on your own turf! You could say it's the new 1984 if 28 years down the road we're still talking about that
Favors Flave
Well-Known Member
I wonder if Bronco pulled his offer yet?
7StraightIsGreat
Well-Known Member
Man, the lack of reading comprehension amongst BYU fans seems to be spreading. For the record, I never said that sneaking beer into RES was impossible, or doesn't happen. I simply pointed out that there are no beer sales at RES. Scat gave the example of a woman getting caught trying to sneak in a 24 pack of beer and getting caught. I'm sure he didn't give that example in an attempt to help make my point, but it kinda does. It would stand to reason that anybody who's pouring beer on opposing fans at or near the end of a football game probably had ALOT of beer to begin with. That's not very likely. As Salty pointed out, any beer that is successfully brought into RES has most likely got to be in pretty small quantities. Add to that the complete and utter lack of witnesses to this supposed incident that happened out in the open surrounded by thousands and simple logic leads us to the only reasonable conclusion: Max Hall and/or his family are lying, and that my friends is not very classy.
it's not worth discussing with you retards, but if you objectively look at it, the chances of Hall lying are slim, and the chances of some drunk jagoff pouring beer on their hated rival's family is pretty fat.
But you guys go ahead and believe what you want to believe.
But you guys go ahead and believe what you want to believe.
green
Well-Known Member
Didn't Hall accuse an Arizona fan of doing the same thing to his family while at Arizona State?
So you believe if a tree falls in the woods, and nobody is there to hear it, it does not make a sound?
Did I hear the sproink noise cognitive dissonance makes when you wrote this?
I actually believe that it doesn't make a sound. There has to be a receptor of some kind to take that sound in, and if there is none, then there really isn't a sound.
Who says there wasn't one, it just didn't happen to be a person.
If a squirrel is in the forrest, or a bird, or a microphone, or any other type of receptor, then there will be a sound. If there is not, then there is nothing to absorb the waves, therefore, no sound is made.
What if it's another tree, and the tree is shaped like a microphone?
Does that mean the "sound" does not exist? No waves would go out from the tree falling because there wasn't a squirrel near enough to hear it?
That sounds just as good as anything I've posted.
I say the sound exists, whether or not there is someone or something to "hear" it.
The sound waves would still happen. Someone being there to hear it makes no difference.
Gravity still exists in China, even if I'm not there to experience it.
Water is still in the deepest hole in the ocean, even if nobody has ever seen it.
Ute students are still idiots, even if they transfer to Stanford.
There are just some laws that are absolute.
Quit trying to distract me from my cognitive dissonance line.
Q for MFT.
Dammit, I'm sorry about your thread, idiot Ute students/fans, but I just have to finish this up.
I made the mistake of getting a subscription to Scientific American a few years ago before I knew that you had to have a Phd in theoretical physics and two other majors in chemistry, biology, psychology, and/or any of the other 'ology's in order to get past the first page. I take their word as God. Therefore, The Trout is right and The Spazz is retarded.
Now, back to making fun of Salty please.
I made the mistake of getting a subscription to Scientific American a few years ago before I knew that you had to have a Phd in theoretical physics and two other majors in chemistry, biology, psychology, and/or any of the other 'ology's in order to get past the first page. I take their word as God. Therefore, The Trout is right and The Spazz is retarded.
Now, back to making fun of Salty please.
That's a bunch of garbage. The waves are the sound, so they are still there whether ears are there to receive it or not. A microphone is not an ear, and yet it can record or transmit the sound. If you break sound down, it is still there whether we are there to hear it or not. Stupid scientists trying to ply their hand at philosophy. Just because the nerds publish it, doesn't mean they are right. Sound is vibration, and the vibration is still there when the tree falls.
Trout, you are back to retarded, and I am right.
My word is greater than a few idiot Ute graduate scientists. Sheesh, I thought you knew that.
I am truly curious as to why you believe this.