Ellipse
Well-Known Member
Does this guy even watch Jazz games? He is trying hard to justify his opinion that Hood isn't that bad on defense, but this is nonsense:http://www.basketballinsiders.com/nba-daily-why-teams-should-pursue-rodney-hood/
Perhaps the Jazz are simply performing due diligence on Hood, as all teams do with all players at this time of year. But if the team is truly open to moving Hood, all 29 opposing teams should be pulling out all the stops to be the team that successfully trades for him.
"At this point last season, the Jazz were outscoring opponents by 7.8 points per 100 possessions with Hood on court, the team’s third-best net rating. This year, in only 85 fewer minutes, Utah is being outscored by 3.6 per 100 with Hood on court, nearly three points worse than any other Jazz player with at least 700 minutes.
"As always, context is king. Last season over the same stretch, Hood shared the floor with defensive stopper Rudy Gobert for 899 minutes. This season, due to shifting roles, Hood has played only 254 minutes with Gobert. This almost certainly accounts for the fact that the Jazz is allowing a team-worst 107.7 per 100 after limiting opponents to 103 during Hood’s minutes in the same segment of 2016-17."
So the reason the Jazz is allowing 107.7 per 100 with Hood on the floor is because Mitchell replaced Hood in the starting lineup? Poor Hood just isn't getting enough playing time with Gobert, because his starting role went to DM. Well, damn, maybe if Gobert hadn't missed 26 games from injury and if Hood hadn't missed 15 games from whatever, perhaps Rodney could have spent more time playing with Gobert. Of course, Hood did start the first 12 games of the season with Gobert....