NAOS
Well-Known Member
Some of us working folk have a job to do, and think it's a better idea to do their job than argue.
Forgive me if I took a break from all this to work.
yeah, man, sorry for puttin you through the ringer. Phew. u okay?
Some of us working folk have a job to do, and think it's a better idea to do their job than argue.
Forgive me if I took a break from all this to work.
yeah, man, sorry for puttin you through the ringer. Phew. u okay?
1. I back up ElRoachO's posts
2. He tries to help me think differently than I'm currently thinking
3. I still don't quite get that he's not against me, just against the inability to see the other side's PoV.
4. ???????????????????
5. Profit.
Good enough to throw it at your mom.
But she's like a used car dealership; any car any time.
No one is saying America is a bad place to live. (Except maybe DutchJazzer; but eff that guy)
Some of us are saying we'd like to see poverty cleaned up, the discouraging income inequality addressed, and bring a level of overall happiness to everyone.
Others of us are saying they see footing the bill for everyone else as a slant against their pride. They worked hard for their money, dammit, they've earned it.
Bickering amongst each other is how we find a middle ground we can all live with.
But I think most of us can agree our current government system, from law makers to SS Check dispensaries, could be doing a better, more efficient job with whatever amount of money we send them. How much, or how little each of us have sent, is inconsequential.
So are you now saying that little thought experiment was more than a joke? Because you plead down to joking earlier. If it was supposed to teach me something, would you care to distill it for us here? now? tia
Perhaps I'm misinterpreting, but it sure feels like Dalamon is doing his best to infer that America is quite subpar as a country. If I'm wrong, then I apologize and retract my statement.
Also, Scandinavian countries basically don't have to fund a military. A few years ago the average age of a Danish soldier was 42-years old. Their whole system is job safety net. It helps when NATO fronts the vast vast majority of your costs.
That's basically the problem with every one of these dramatic, fear mongering 'look over there, that country is so much better because <insert random statistic here>. Most of them fall flat on their face in a matter of a few moments of reflection.
No one is saying America is a bad place to live. (Except maybe DutchJazzer; but eff that guy)
Some of us are saying we'd like to see poverty cleaned up, the discouraging income inequality addressed, and bring a level of overall happiness to everyone.
Others of us are saying they see footing the bill for everyone else as a slant against their pride. They worked hard for their money, dammit, they've earned it.
Bickering amongst each other is how we find a middle ground we can all live with.
But I think most of us can agree our current government system, from law makers to SS Check dispensaries, could be doing a better, more efficient job with whatever amount of money we send them. How much, or how little each of us have sent, is inconsequential.
If the goal is to bring happiness we need to address the culture of consumerism more than income inequality.
The part about you opening a door and realizing you don't know as much as you think was a joke. So was the rep comment.
The part about me trying to get you to see it any other way but your own, was not.
And to a degree is another example.
I pride myself in being able to get people to see it a way differently than what they're imagining. I'm very good at this, and is a huge part of my job.
I was unable to get you to see a pile of money as a source of pride, instead of just a pile of money.
So because you can't catch what I'm throwing, it's like my version of a higher tax rate. It hits me in not my pocketbook, but my pride.
Does that make sense to you?
Frankie poo, when you see an idea that's working, and there are statistics to back it up, does that not cause you to think "hey... maybe that could work"?
Or is your first instinct "no no no, that'll never work. It's not the way I do things, so it can't be right"
A great point. And it could be a great plan.
But why couldn't we do both?
A great point. And it could be a great plan.
But why couldn't we do both?
You asked me if a pile of money was something to be proud about. I said No, not inherently. And then I gave you an example of a huge pile of money that nobody should feel pride about.
Does that mean that all piles of money are devoid of prideful feelings? Obviously not.
Then you started asking me about what I was proud about, as if you could show me the equivalence between the pride in money and my pride in other things. That didn't work out well because you failed to come up with an adequate thought experiment.
Why don't we just reorder the way that gendering happens, too. I mean, since we're just breaking things down so easily, moving around their atomic parts, we should fix that, too, right?
How long have you been a motivational speaker?
But a pile of money can be something to be proud of. It is not something you can exclusively NOT be proud of.
For some people, a pile of money is a way of quantifying their life's work. Their pile of money, to them, is the same as your making room for needy students, or ability to care for your little sister.
Taking some of those things away from you, is the same thing as taking away money from others. It's the same concept. You don't seem to get that.
Frankie poo, when you see an idea that's working, and there are statistics to back it up, does that not cause you to think "hey... maybe that could work"?
Or is your first instinct "no no no, that'll never work. It's not the way I do things, so it can't be right"