What's new
By:

SUCCES! the left winning at banning guns!!!!!!!!!

What would have been gay is posting a pic of my "better" vehicle rather than my desert-rat-mobile.
 
Stoked said:
Really? Hundreds, if not thousands, of stories can be trotted out that fit "I told you so narratives" for both sides.

Unconvincing of anything.
Click to expand...

Situations like that would never happen in Japan for example...
 
Stoked said:
This isn't Japan. There are so many differences that the comparison is useless.
Click to expand...

Humans living in advanced economy vs humans living in advanced economy. Not much difference except one country is much smaller with much higher capita per sq ft. Seems like the smaller one should have bigger problems yet it is vice versa.
 
MVP said:
Never said ban guns. Police needs them. Hunters can have them under strict regulations and licencing. Rest of the people don't need them.
Click to expand...

YOU ARE A TYRANT.
WHO ARE YOU TO TELL JOHN DOE if he needs a gun or not

you have not walked in his shoes.

you do not need or want a gun. that does not give you the right to take it away from others

MOLON LABE!
 
DutchJazzer said:
YOU ARE A TYRANT.
Click to expand...

No, I just have a common sense. If you are not police officer and not a hunter gun is not needed for everyday Joe. Fact that USA is leading in children related gun accidents and deaths and in general gun related accidents and death proves that it is stupid and dangerous to give average Joe access to guns without any restrictions.
 
MVP said:
No, I just have a common sense. If you are not police officer and not a hunter gun is not needed for everyday Joe. Fact that USA is leading in children related gun accidents and deaths and in general gun related accidents and death proves that it is stupid and dangerous to give average Joe access to guns without any restrictions.
Click to expand...

i have common sense,
a few of my friends died in car accident, and 1 got crippled severely. i think only extremely qualified uber drivers should be allowed to drive.
 
MVP said:
No, I just have a common sense. If you are not police officer and not a hunter gun is not needed for everyday Joe. Fact that USA is leading in children related gun accidents and deaths and in general gun related accidents and death proves that it is stupid and dangerous to give average Joe access to guns without any restrictions.
Click to expand...

Everyone knows that only people who love tyranny want to take away guns. And it is just common sense that most gun owners only want guns to protect their life and property. It is stupid and dangerous to say that average Joe does not have a right to defend himself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MVP
MVP said:
If average Tom does not have gun to attack average Joe, why average Joe needs to defend himself with a gun?
Click to expand...

I'm tall and thin, unlike most American men I didn't use steroids in high school and college. Nor do spend hours each week learning karate or Kung fu. If I got in a fist fight I wouldn't last 5 seconds. But if random tom, joe, dick or Harry decides to enter my house uninvited he will never get a chance to start a fist fight with me.

On any given day I have 5 or 6 people who look to me as their defender. Cops don't defend, they investigate, and take statements from victims. So if you are asking me to leave those people undefended, are you willing to follow me and them for the rest of my life, protecting them, giving me peace of mind, all while staying discretely hidden away? Can I show my kids how you work, and have them practice having you defend them? And when I get old can I gift your protection to one of my grandsons so that he too can defend the people he loves?

I suppose You are both unwilling and unable to protect me that way. So before you say another word about taking away my protection, please tell me your plan for getting all of the mentally unstable people off the streets, out of the neighborhoods, out of the shopping centers, schools etc. are you going to build massive asylums, or skip the cost and euthanize? Tell us your plan for getting all illegal drugs off the street, and the addicts too. Don't forget to include the people hooked on prescription drugs. You should probably institute prohibition again so violent drunks are no longer a threat. Then tell us your plan for eliminating gangs, and even groups of kids who create havoc for fun. Also, I am very curious about your plan to keep 6-6, 330 lb men from becoming angry, ever. Since I spend quite a bit of time outside the city I will also be looking for your plan to round up and destroy all bears, Cougars, wolves, coyotes, and rattlesnakes, and any other small criter that that could get rabies or distemper and cause harm. Lock up the borders, no more international flights, and make the world safe for my babies then come back and we'll talk about gun control.
 
mellow said:
I'm tall and thin, unlike most American men I didn't use steroids in high school and college. Nor do spend hours each week learning karate or Kung fu. If I got in a fist fight I wouldn't last 5 seconds. But if random tom, joe, dick or Harry decides to enter my house uninvited he will never get a chance to start a fist fight with me.

On any given day I have 5 or 6 people who look to me as their defender. Cops don't defend, they investigate, and take statements from victims. So if you are asking me to leave those people undefended, are you willing to follow me and them for the rest of my life, protecting them, giving me peace of mind, all while staying discretely hidden away? Can I show my kids how you work, and have them practice having you defend them? And when I get old can I gift your protection to one of my grandsons so that he too can defend the people he loves?

I suppose You are both unwilling and unable to protect me that way. So before you say another word about taking away my protection, please tell me your plan for getting all of the mentally unstable people off the streets, out of the neighborhoods, out of the shopping centers, schools etc. are you going to build massive asylums, or skip the cost and euthanize? Tell us your plan for getting all illegal drugs off the street, and the addicts too. Don't forget to include the people hooked on prescription drugs. You should probably institute prohibition again so violent drunks are no longer a threat. Then tell us your plan for eliminating gangs, and even groups of kids who create havoc for fun. Also, I am very curious about your plan to keep 6-6, 330 lb men from becoming angry, ever. Since I spend quite a bit of time outside the city I will also be looking for your plan to round up and destroy all bears, Cougars, wolves, coyotes, and rattlesnakes, and any other small criter that that could get rabies or distemper and cause harm. Lock up the borders, no more international flights, and make the world safe for my babies then come back and we'll talk about gun control.
Click to expand...


At first I thought you are joking in your previous post but now I see that you are dead serious. Wow, I feel sorry for you if you are so paranoid that you can't live without gun because you feel threatened by rattlesnakes or coyotes. You better request the right to build fortress and have a tank with nuke.... because you know your average neighbour Joe just may have bigger gun then you.
 
MVP said:
If average Tom does not have gun to attack average Joe, why average Joe needs to defend himself with a gun?
Click to expand...

you just lack common sense.


a criminal ignores the law.
so why make a law that guns are illegal, does that law have magical properties. is that law unbreakable.

NOOO! that is not common sense.
tresspassing is illegal, murder is illegal
so someone who wants to shoot up something.
is tresspassing(1 law he broke)
is commiting murder another law he broke.
so you want to add a 3rd law he could/would break.
please man go get common sense
 
i would be perfectly willing to give up my guns.
but the lawmakers would have to give up guns first.

only 2 people call for gun control. those who are ignorant like mvp.
and those who are protected by guns wether it is illegal or not like. and those are TYRANTS:

example.
110113armed.jpg

article-2675049-1F40704B00000578-125_634x452.jpg

imageedit_946_4260456372.jpg
.

you are the ignorant one, you lack common sense so thee is no convincing you.

if the other "antti-gun" think a gun is not necessary they should lead by example.
well guess what they think guns are necessary to protect themself (obama, kings and queens around the world, the pope et al). but not for avg joe.
so you get 2 classes of people. those who are important enough to be protected by GUNS and those who ARE NOT.
that means not everyone is equal, there is the royals and the peasants, i am a free man i dont belong to the royals or the peasant.


see the common sense in all this, ooh wait you lack common sense.

and this is a slippery slope, there has been a string of break ins in my neighbourhood so cops went door to door questioning neighbors if they seen anything suspicious and warn us. the cp flat out told me if there is someone in my house i should flee. so wait i have no safe haven? someone can come into my house and i cant kick his ***?
it is illegal to defend myself unless i am cornered and no possible way to flee.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top