What's new
By:

Go GET Teague

Hack said:
I find it hilarious how mad people around here get if you question the decisions of the team.
Click to expand...

I don't think "mad" is the correct operative word here. I for certain am not upset in any way. Just having discussion. :-)
 
PG_AB said:
In these 24 pages has anyone answered this question that I posted on the 1st??


who was the last player "out indefinitely" that was traded in the NBA ??


In what world does the 4th team in the east trade a starting PG for a SG that's out indefinitely??? seems like fantasy to me.
Click to expand...

Burks will be back before the deadline. So there would be no injured players involved in this trade.

Having said that,
I wouldn't include burks in the trade
 
Hack said:
I find it hilarious how mad people around here get if you question the decisions of the team.
Click to expand...

Wasn't mad I was just laughing that you were going on about the Knicks being aggressive and yada yada when their front office has generally been one of the worst over the past 15 years. It was nice of them to gift us Gordon Hayward though... Thanks Isiah!

We have made mistakes for sure, but our mistakes have been much smaller.
 
Jeditiger said:
The Knicks are terrible and have been since the Ewing days. Even then they could only get to one NBA finals; and that was their first since 1972. No, the Knicks are content to HEMORRHAGE money to build a team. Same thing they've been doing for decades. Hasn't worked out so well, has it? Plus, big market teams with built in wealth (the NYK is the most valuable NBA franchise) have WAY more flexibility to take risks. And if their fans don't like it, the team DGAF - they'll do what they see fit. There's NO WAY the Jazz could afford to do that on so many levels.

As far as no major FA coming to the Utah Jazz: this is been the case since day 1, 1979 and it hasn't changed. After almost 40 years, one would have to understand that this would be the case in perpetuity unless the Jazz get REALLY lucky. So this should be treated as a given fact and not something to beat up management over.

So, realistically and from a competitive standpoint, the formula the Jazz are using is practical and sensible as opposed to wreckless. And that's our Jazz
Click to expand...

words are cool and all. let me know when the Jazz formula works. k?
 
Jeditiger said:
I don't think "mad" is the correct operative word here. I for certain am not upset in any way. Just having discussion. :-)
Click to expand...

No dang it! You disagree so you MUST be mad. There is no other explanation, none.
 
Hack said:
words are cool and all. let me know when the Jazz formula works. k?
Click to expand...

2003-2008 Pistons - 1 chip
1997-2015 Spurs - 5 chips

The formula does work. It has been proven to work. Now the Jazz has not had the success of the Spurs but the formula is the same. Jazz could certainly turn out to match the Pistons as far as success though.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
They clear cap room for next year... we use cap room. We are about $7M under the cap currently so we can use that plus the other guys to make the schematics work. Salary is always a consideration.

You have to give something of value to get something. You aren't acquiring teague for Burke and filler. I think Mil. would give them the Clippers pick they have or some other fringe asset that would beat the Burke plus filler offer.
Click to expand...

I think you are over valuing Teague. The Jazz can have them if they want him. He has one foot out the door and the Hawks need to resolve the situation.
 
b_line said:
Ball park Frank: what do you suggest the jazz do instead of building like they are? It's not as if Hayward, favors and gobert are scrubs. Hood is looking like a pretty sure thing too. The fact that they haven't signed or traded for another borderline star doesn't mean they never will. It just means they haven't found the right deal yet.

Are we as fans buying a load of crap? Sure. But at least we haven't traded everything like the teams in new York and have nothing to show for it.
Click to expand...

New York is better than the Jazz this year.
 
Perhaps Exum will turn into a solid bench player
Maybe Hood will become a serviceable starter a la Marvin Williams
Perhaps Hayward will improve slightly more
Maybe Favors will as well
Perhaps Gobert won't be an offensive sink hole to fill every nigh
Maybe the Jazz will get lucky and draft a player in the second round who breaks out (before players are let go in free agency)
Perhaps the Jazz won't blow it all up again
Maybe the Jazz will bring in another painful patch like Al Jefferson
Perhaps then they will blow it up
Maybe.
 
franklin said:
Perhaps Exum will turn into a solid bench player
Maybe Hood will become a serviceable starter a la Marvin Williams
Perhaps Hayward will improve slightly more
Maybe Favors will as well
Perhaps Gobert won't be an offensive sink hole to fill every nigh
Maybe the Jazz will get lucky and draft a player in the second round who breaks out (before players are let go in free agency)
Perhaps the Jazz won't blow it all up again
Maybe the Jazz will bring in another painful patch like Al Jefferson
Perhaps then they will blow it up
Maybe.
Click to expand...

Marvin Williams scores 9.7 point per game on 40% shooting. We can only hope Hood aspires to be this good some day.
 
franklin said:
Perhaps Exum will turn into a solid bench player
Maybe Hood will become a serviceable starter a la Marvin Williams
Perhaps Hayward will improve slightly more
Maybe Favors will as well
Perhaps Gobert won't be an offensive sink hole to fill every nigh
Maybe the Jazz will get lucky and draft a player in the second round who breaks out (before players are let go in free agency)
Perhaps the Jazz won't blow it all up again
Maybe the Jazz will bring in another painful patch like Al Jefferson
Perhaps then they will blow it up
Maybe.
Click to expand...

Hood is already a "serviceable" starter. He's already much better than Marvin Williams.
Favors has and continues to improve every season.
Hayward is improving every year
Jazz have hit gold the last two years in the late first round.


You are over playing your hand trying to make a point.
 
franklin said:
New York is better than the Jazz this year.
Click to expand...

They're 300:1 to win the Chip this year, and Utah's 500:1..

Also the Knicks dont own their 2016 draft pick, so they've got all the incentive to be better... and their players on average are 3½ years older than Utah's
 
franklin said:
Perhaps Exum will turn into a solid bench player
Maybe Hood will become a serviceable starter a la Marvin Williams
Perhaps Hayward will improve slightly more
Maybe Favors will as well
Perhaps Gobert won't be an offensive sink hole to fill every nigh
Maybe the Jazz will get lucky and draft a player in the second round who breaks out (before players are let go in free agency)
Perhaps the Jazz won't blow it all up again
Maybe the Jazz will bring in another painful patch like Al Jefferson
Perhaps then they will blow it up
Maybe.
Click to expand...

Maybe we go on a win steak and dont lose a game again this season and win the chip.
Perhaps maybe Franklin wont make troll posts in the future.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top