I agree with all of thisjust because Exum has shooting guard size does not necessarily mean that he's an ideal fit to plug and play at the 2 spot. I like Exum/Burks long-term more than Teague/Exum. . . and I really like a guard lineup of Teague/Exum/Neto at the 1 and Hood/Burks at the 2.
Hope DL stands firm and keeps Burks.
Lolololol.![]()
![]()
what think??
Sent from my E600A using Tapatalk
Ahh, I see. Just the starting points and then meet in the middle.Seems like a pretty logical first offer from both sides.
Swap Burke for Teague, get Burks healthy and move Lyles into the rotation to finish out the season. Sounds like a good plan for a jump start on offense with how the team has been playing defense lately.
Me tooI think Withey is actually better
Yes.Ok people what say you?
Burke, Booker and OKC 1st for Teague
Yes or no?
Ok people what say you?
Burke, Booker and OKC 1st for Teague
Yes or no?
Moving Booker makes only sense in two scenarios:
-Freeing up cap space for the summer when you're sure you can sign someone to a big deal(When's the day his contract becomes guaranteed?)
-Netting a better individual player(Who can actually shoot - and by that I mean more than 3 attempts per game from range...)
Im really surprised how many people are willing to include multiple picks when we have shown an ability to get steals in the latter half of the draft. If the team really does consist of a lot of players who will eventually have to get paid, we will want that influx of young and cheap talent.
lol. No. Getting Teague for Booker and Burke is pretty much getting him for free. You get a massive upgrade at the team's weakest spot, free up more playing time for Lyles, without losing anything of consequence. It is pretty much a dream scenario for the Jazz.
I'm shocked people want Teague for any of our players, or picks. While we are at it, let's just also trade Exum so we don't waste his talent. The notion of trading for Teague is absolutely dumb as hell while we have Exum.Im really surprised how many people are willing to include multiple picks when we have shown an ability to get steals in the latter half of the draft. If the team really does consist of a lot of players who will eventually have to get paid, we will want that influx of young and cheap talent.
If Atlanta agrees to that trade, they should replace Bud as GM.
I'm shocked people want Teague for any of our players, or picks. While we are at it, let's just also trade Exum so we don't waste his talent. The notion of trading for Teague is absolutely dumb as hell while we have Exum.
If Atlanta agrees to that trade, they should replace Bud as GM.
So you're willing to bet on Exum's full recovery, projected talent and improvement over moving very tradable, non-core assets over a prime, veteran, former allstar PG?
That, my friends, is treadmill mentality. If you can get 1.5 yrs of Teague for Burke/Book,Tibor, CJ, Ingles, etc/picks you do it and don't look back. There's a reason everyone and their mother knows our biggest weakness is PG. If Exum's injury affects his current game at all, he won't be a starter and we're back to looking for a starter quality PG.
This deal would be a bird-in-hand IMO and you do it and don't look back. If they require Burks/Hood you hang up.