You and Gameface must live in North Korea.
Naw, I just don't attend very many klan rallies.
You and Gameface must live in North Korea.
You know, we have a Trump of our own and everytime he wins an election, I kinda wish I voted him so I could have vote the winner at least once in my lifetime.
My impression is that the service I receive from government entities is significantly worse than the service I receive from the private sector. If a private sector company imitated DMV's service practices they would soon be out of business.No but I can read and understand data.
Please point out to me where I've argued that government provision of services is in all cases high quality? That the DMV may not work well at times is irrelevant to the discussion, particularly when one has actual data one can use, as opposed to anecdotes.
I suppose, then, that if I pointed out anecdotes of poor efficiency and service delivery by certain private sector firms, you'd find that a compelling reason to conclude that the private sector is inherently inefficient. That is, at least, what the logic of your argument suggest.
Neither am I necessarily suggesting the US should move to a single payer system; what I want is a reasonable, rational policy debate about health care policy, which isn't possible given the current environment created by Republican dog whistle pandering to it's angry white person base.
My impression is that the service I receive from government entities is significantly worse than the service I receive from the private sector. If a private sector company imitated DMV's service practices they would soon be out of business.
Ya, they have got things turned around.The DMV has been pretty phenomenal the last 4 times I've had to go there.
How many private businesses have you interacted with that are funded by public funds and must adhere for public procurement procedures? There's a reason its slow and inefficient, it's called tax payer accountability. It adds many layers of bureaucracy to every publicly funded and operated entity. So when people say that the private sector could do it better and faster, they really have no ****ing clue what they're talking about. FYI.
My impression is that the service I receive from government entities is significantly worse than the service I receive from the private sector.
My ex wife worked for the health department. Her coworkers talked about the public with contempt. They bragged about golfing during working hours, setting files aside when business owners frustrated them, etc. I do not think that these sorts of things are because of increased accountability. The delays at the DMV have nothing to do with the issues you state. They US Post office does not have long lines because of accountability. The lines are long because it makes no difference to anyone at the post office to open up another window when there are a lot of customers waiting. On the opposite side of the spectrum, the grocery store down the street from me immediately opens another checkstand any time three or more people are in line. Are they able to do this because they don't have tax payer accountability?How many private businesses have you interacted with that are funded by public funds and must adhere for public procurement procedures? There's a reason its slow and inefficient, it's called tax payer accountability. It adds many layers of bureaucracy to every publicly funded and operated entity. So when people say that the private sector could do it better and faster, they really have no ****ing clue what they're talking about. FYI.
My ex wife worked for the health department. Her coworkers talked about the public with contempt. They bragged about golfing during working hours, setting files aside when business owners frustrated them, etc. I do not think that these sorts of things are because of increased accountability. The delays at the DMV have nothing to do with the issues you state. They US Post office does not have long lines because of accountability. The lines are long because it makes no difference to anyone at the post office to open up another window when there are a lot of customers waiting. On the opposite side of the spectrum, the grocery store down the street from me immediately opens another checkstand any time three or more people are in line. Are they able to do this because they don't have tax payer accountability?
I commented that I get better service in the private sector than the public. You said that was because of accountability issues. I gave specific examples that have nothing to do with accountability. You now say it has to do with pay and are giving me the boo hoo treatment. Makes sense.While your personal anecdotes are great stories, they in no way represent the system as a whole. I'm sorry your wife worked with assholes, but that happens in the private sector too. If you're so unhappy with your service at the post office, why go to fedex or UPS instead. Cost you say? Yeah, unfortunately good stuff costs money, and under paid, stressed out public employees sometimes don't give a **** about your feelings. Get over it, or go to bat to increase pay and service for public institutions. As for all the other stuff, yeah most of that is due to limited resources and laziness. Boo hoo.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
While your personal anecdotes are great stories, they in no way represent the system as a whole.
I commented that I get better service in the private sector than the public. You said that was because of accountability issues. I gave specific examples that have nothing to do with accountability. You now say it has to do with pay and are giving me the boo hoo treatment. Makes sense.
BTW, who gets paid more, postal employees or grocery store clerks?
And regarding my ex's coworkers, they knew and bragged that they could not be fired. They also knew they had an early retirement and pension headed their way. I could give numerous examples of this in the public sector. Although you claim it's just as common in the private sector, I can't think of any examples. What I can think of are examples of people who got fired from private sector positions for doing a bad job.
Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/timwor...actions-tax-it-would-lose-money/#547852545974With a tax rate of 0.1% the model shows drops in GDP (-1.76%) in the long-run. It should be noted that these strong
results are related to the fact that the tax is cumulative and cascading which leads to rather strong economic reactions in
the model.’ (Vol. 1 (Summary), p. 50)
‘[A] stylised transaction tax on securities (STT), where it is assumed that all investment in the economy are financed with
the help of securities (shares and bonds) at 0.1% is simulated to cause output losses (i.e. deviation of GDP from its longrun
baseline level) of up to 1.76% in the long run, while yielding annual revenues of less than 0.1% of GDP.’ (Vol. 1 (Summary),
p. 33)
A reasonable estimate of the marginal rate of taxation for EU countries is 40-50% of any increase in GDP. That is, that
from all of the various taxes levied, 40-50% of any increase in GDP ends up as tax revenues to the respective governments.
Thus if we have a fall of 1.76% in GDP we have a fall in tax revenues of 0.7-0.9% of GDP. The proposed FTT is
a tax which collects 0.1% of GDP while other tax collections fall by 0.7-0.9% of GDP. It is very difficult indeed to describe
this as an increase in tax revenue.
So decrease in GDP, decrease in revenue, and decrease in tax revenue. Sounds great. Let's also mention that it probably won't hurt the big guys, but the people that just dabble in investments? They're going to stop. Their brokers? Out of a job. There are better ways to raise money than this tax.
How many private businesses have you interacted with that are funded by public funds and must adhere for public procurement procedures? There's a reason its slow and inefficient, it's called tax payer accountability. It adds many layers of bureaucracy to every publicly funded and operated entity. So when people say that the private sector could do it better and faster, they really have no ****ing clue what they're talking about. FYI.
One of us didn't read your original post very closely. (Hint: It wasn't me.)I didn't mention accountability at all. I said it was due to cost, and public procurement issues aka bureaucracy. You're whining using generalities and platitudes as grounds for complaints. I'm saying you don't understand the system. But if your going to complain because assholes exist, well I don't know what to tell you.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
One of us didn't read your original post very closely. (Hint: It wasn't me.)
Can I ask why Americans are so incredibly committed to the constitution? Probably a difficult question. I mean i get that it's the founding document of your country, but it's over 200 years old. I'm not saying ya'll should scrap the whole thing, but why are people so outraged when anyone suggests doing something that might be even slightly 'unconstitutional'?