The Thriller
Well-Known Member
Awww. Well then. That makes it so much better!
What's funny is how he still handcuffs the poor black guy after he shoots him. If he had really aimed for the autistic kid then why did he handcuff the black guy?
Police shoots black behavioural therapist who was laying on the ground with his hands up.
- Thread starter MVP
- Start date
Awww. Well then. That makes it so much better!
What's funny is how he still handcuffs the poor black guy after he shoots him. If he had really aimed for the autistic kid then why did he handcuff the black guy?
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
You just know police chiefs everywhere are using this to tell other cops to always shoot to kill.
D
Deleted member 848
Guest
3 of the victims were Kosovo-Albanians. Wow.
The Thriller
Well-Known Member
How often does this sort of thing happen but without cameras?
Officer makes a huge mistake. And then his buddies run to cover up for him. The "bro code" is more important than actual justice.
I think mandatory body cameras and a non-partisan objective 3rd party should investigate ALL police shootings. That way we can finally have some transparency here.
I just wonder how many other times this has happened in just the last few years? All of the blacks killed by white cops lately have been very suspicious. Trayvon Martin, yet another very suspicious shooting. How many cops have gotten away with these crimes?
Officer makes a huge mistake. And then his buddies run to cover up for him. The "bro code" is more important than actual justice.
I think mandatory body cameras and a non-partisan objective 3rd party should investigate ALL police shootings. That way we can finally have some transparency here.
I just wonder how many other times this has happened in just the last few years? All of the blacks killed by white cops lately have been very suspicious. Trayvon Martin, yet another very suspicious shooting. How many cops have gotten away with these crimes?
JimLes
Well-Known Member
Some sort of a civilian body to oversee the police is badly needed. The kind that will mete out punishment for things like this without worrying about hurting someone's feelings or punishing a buddy.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Is this really true? What's your source?
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
His ***. Pulled it straight from it. They are called Demofacts
I heard this many times, I thought it was common knowledge. Last time was on NPR, where a former chief of police discusses it at length. A quick Google search yields many articles on the subject.
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/12/police-gun-shooting-training-ferguson/383681/
Are you for real? I'm serious. Are you a character like Boris? Or are you really that stupid? It's okay if you are. You don't choose your brain capacity, and you hardly seem to have any. But I want to know whether to feel pity or contempt for you.
Red
Well-Known Member
Also relevant is the likelihood that white cops view blacks as "prone to violence". This fact was demonstrated in the arrest filmed here. Clearly, the cop was more then a little physical in arresting this black female. Given the circumstances, it might be fair to wonder if it really needed to end in an arrest at all. But the cop then admits that whites(including, presumably, white cops) view blacks as having "violent tendencies". Whether viewed as violent by nature or by whatever reason, this is an assumption that seems to play into this cops approach to arresting blacks.
https://news.vice.com/article/austi...twice-blames-black-peoples-violent-tendencies
Here is the exchange in which the officer mentions these assumptions of blacks being prone to violence:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FBVt6...lLfHVtMphOdKrKoOwHJH6D2USQaXSNRXTVtB9sU7zfeNw
I did post this in the thread discussing how the police handle those resisting arrest, but it does seem relevant to this discussion as well....
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
Okay, okay, you pulled it straight from someone else's ***. I forgot, that is kind of place you like to hang out.
Serious question, are you going to explode with anger one day? Maybe shoot up a mall or something? You need help. You seem to have a problem speaking without flipping out. I feel sorry for your family. Family get togethers must be rough.
Reported to the real authorities.
Last edited:
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Thanks for the response. I'm not sure the fact that it's being discussed necessarily means that it is emphasized over things like public safety, but I can see how it would get greater attention in the officer's mind anyway. Many officer's wives probably remind them of this sort of stuff every time they leave for work.
But you said the entire approach to training was problematic. I'm trying to imagine how they could leave this sort of stuff out of it and what sort of approach you believe they should take.
Joe Bagadonuts
Well-Known Member
Negged and reported. You should definitely receive a ban for saying crap like this. Absolutely uncalled for.
Not ban worthy.
Miggs
Well-Known Member
Just ignore him. He went way beyond the line with fish months ago, went into hiding, and has returned to go on his rants, which when intelligently refuted and rebuked, are met with further misinformation, rants, name-calling, and such, all with very hostile and racist overtones.
I'm going with contempt.
He threatened to expose things about fish's wife a while back. I have a really hard time imagining that he knows jack **** about fish or his wife, but it was so far over the line. He's completely disgusting.
I engaged him yesterday and got one of the stupidest most asinine responses I've ever gotten on Jazzfanz in return, which is really saying something. I've got him on ignore now. I'd rather try to have a serious conversation with [MENTION=4486]Boris[/MENTION].
Not the post. His very existence.
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
You degenerates are something else. Cry me a river.