they have to do that **** on purpose right? like no way the editing guys can be like "thats the one" with good conscience right?
perhaps, but even when he's not scoring, he's almost always been a good facilitator, defender, etc. he's been a well rounded player for the last 3+ years, not star level, but an above average starter.
I'd say he's been a star the past two years, but I think that's just a matter of personal definition.
He just doesn't jump out as a special player until you pay deeper attention. Then you can see just how good he is
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
I'm sure we've all thought at one point or another 'wtf it doesn't seem like Hayward is doing anything when he's on the floor'.
He just isn't the physical specimen or high skilled player to make a presence just by being on the court. He's a really interesting blend of the two. Those games have been less and less common this year though
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
It's the face a raccoon or possum makes when you find them in your garbage can.
I'm glad our key players played right up until the end. smh
Jazz dont play til Saturday, dont get your panties in a bunch.
ThisIt's the face a raccoon or possum makes when you find them in your garbage can.
I guess my point is just that Hayward isn't elite at any one thing, and that makes it difficult to define him as a star at first glance. I think Kyle Lowry suffers from the same problem.
Other stars have defining traits, like one on one skill (melo, pierce), shooting (dame, curry), defense (gobert), athleticism and handles (wall, Irving), being ridiculous physical specimens (lebron, giannis). Hayward's biggest defining trait might be the fact he's white lol.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
I guess my point is just that Hayward isn't elite at any one thing...