What's new
By:

Round 1 Game 2 Utah Jazz at L.A. Clippers 8:30pm MDT

mellow said:
Boston's problem is similar to the Jazz right now--they cant rebound. Jazz will get better when Rudy returns, even if that is next season. Boston is stuck with Horford and crew for a while.
Click to expand...

They should sign Bogut 

(Might get a few minutes of rebounding)
 
Last edited:
It was mentioned earlier in this thread, but no one is challenging BJ.
He is picking his moments when to leave his man and influence the play.

But there is not much dribble penetration designed to challenge him at the rim.
A lot of the penetration is shallow and designed to get open looks for JJ and Hayward.

I get that penetrating might be suicide. But it felt too easy for BJ today.
 
Et tu Brute said:
It was mentioned earlier in this thread, but no one is challenging BJ.
He is picking his moments when to leave his man and influence the play.

But there is not much dribble penetration designed to challenge him at the rim.
A lot of the penetration is shallow and designed to get open looks for JJ and Hayward.

I get that penetrating might be suicide. But it felt too easy for BJ today.
Click to expand...

Who is this BJ you speak of :.. and are you deliberately saying penetration and BJ .... rude .....
 
I didnt get to watch the 2nd half. Why the hell is Quin refusing to play Exum and even Lyles? Favors can go play 33 minutes with crappy D and only 7 rebounds. Lyles is that bad?

Last night was THE best time to play Exum. We already stole game 1. Even if we lose game 2, we have homecourt. So when we come out as flat as we did, why not give Exum a shot? Plain stupid in my opinion.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
LoPo said:
I didnt get to watch the 2nd half. Why the hell is Quin refusing to play Exum and even Lyles? Favors can go play 33 minutes with crappy D and only 7 rebounds. Lyles is that bad?

Last night was THE best time to play Exum. We already stole game 1. Even if we lose game 2, we have homecourt. So when we come out as flat as we did, why not give Exum a shot? Plain stupid in my opinion.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...


I was kind of disappointment when I heard AB wasn't suiting up, was hoping Quin would throw Doc an entirely different look by throwing AB and Dante in to up the tempo and challenge DJ at the rim. I know we kept it close-ish today but imo the Clippers always had total control.
 
The Clippers threesome of (Jordan,Griffin,Paul) finished 29/47 for 63 pts while Jazz (Hayward,Favors,Hill) finished 15/34 for 45 pts.As game 3 comes around the teams are getting to know each other real well.I'd prefer that the Clippers big 3 didn't excel in their win .Jazz need to slow one of these guys down.
For the Jazz ,my biggest fear is they can't score enough points even when they had Gobert.The veteran presence of JJ,Diaw,Hill and Ingles keeps the Jazz games close but they don't score enough to create big worries for the Clippers defense to fear. Toss in only 15 assists to 13 turnovers for the Jazz and the Jazz offense is being squeezed tighter.Jazz need some spark on offense.
 
tleikheen said:
The Clippers threesome of (Jordan,Griffin,Paul) finished 29/47 for 63 pts while Jazz (Hayward,Favors,Hill) finished 15/34 for 45 pts.As game 3 comes around the teams are getting to know each other real well.I'd prefer that the Clippers big 3 didn't excel in their win .Jazz need to slow one of these guys down.
For the Jazz ,my biggest fear is they can't score enough points even when they had Gobert.The veteran presence of JJ,Diaw,Hill and Ingles keeps the Jazz games close but they don't score enough to create big worries for the Clippers defense to fear. Toss in only 15 assists to 13 turnovers for the Jazz and the Jazz offense is being squeezed tighter.Jazz need some spark on offense.
Click to expand...

It's always the downside of not playing through a 'proper' pg IMO.

Hill is being used as a SG/Combo guard who looks for his own shot a lot.
 
LoPo said:
I didnt get to watch the 2nd half. Why the hell is Quin refusing to play Exum and even Lyles? Favors can go play 33 minutes with crappy D and only 7 rebounds. Lyles is that bad?

Last night was THE best time to play Exum. We already stole game 1. Even if we lose game 2, we have homecourt. So when we come out as flat as we did, why not give Exum a shot? Plain stupid in my opinion.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

A little stubborn and inflexible too.

I hope X agent calls Q's (maybe DL) bluff here. Asks for an extension on the basis the Jazz want him long term. If they won't offer something pretty measly - say 4/40 mill, then X has his answer about Q's long term plans.

X should find out their plans - start putting feelers out for potential suitors who will commit to him being a pg.
 
The Clips came out fired up. Impressive that we were able to keep this game somewhat close given their dominance inside. We need to get DJ in foul trouble and put him on the FT line.
 
Et tu Brute said:
A little stubborn and inflexible too.

I hope X agent calls Q's (maybe DL) bluff here. Asks for an extension on the basis the Jazz want him long term. If they won't offer something pretty measly - say 4/40 mill, then X has his answer about Q's long term plans.

X should find out their plans - start putting feelers out for potential suitors who will commit to him being a pg.
Click to expand...
I just find it extremely disappointing. Some guys are relative nonfactors in the season yet create a very strong presence in the postseason. Guys like Austin Croshere, Dellavadova, and even Robert Horry to a certain extent and many more marginal season guys excel in the postseason. Playoff basketball is different than season ball in so many ways.

With all we have hanging in the balance (Hill, Hayward contracts and Burks, Favors futures), why wouldnt we play AB, Lyles and Exum? Last night was a night perfect for testing out guys with zero playoff experience. For all we know, Lyles might have hit that extra gear he hit with Kentucky in that March Madness run. Or Exum emerges as an extremely valuable piece to our puzzle.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Siro said:
Thought we did good, all things considered. Aside from their scorching hot start, it was a pretty even game, despite them exploiting the **** out of Gobert's absence. The Jazz played a little content, but they played hard and executed throughout the game.

With Gobert, I think the series is a done deal. It is doable without him. But it'll be tough.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I counted at least 6 buckets and at least 6 rebounds by LAC that never would have happened with Gobert on the court.

Easily enough to swing the outcome.
 
I thought this was an interesting headline:

"LAC overcame one-sided officiating and cold three-point shooting to take game 2"


Good to know Jazz fans are not the only ones guilty of watching games with fan goggles on.
 
LoPo said:
I just find it extremely disappointing. Some guys are relative nonfactors in the season yet create a very strong presence in the postseason. Guys like Austin Croshere, Dellavadova, and even Robert Horry to a certain extent and many more marginal season guys excel in the postseason. Playoff basketball is different than season ball in so many ways.

With all we have hanging in the balance (Hill, Hayward contracts and Burks, Favors futures), why wouldnt we play AB, Lyles and Exum? Last night was a night perfect for testing out guys with zero playoff experience. For all we know, Lyles might have hit that extra gear he hit with Kentucky in that March Madness run. Or Exum emerges as an extremely valuable piece to our puzzle.

Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

I wonder if Dante and Trey could handle how physical it was and I could totally see Burks trying to do too much and jacking himself up. Jordan was beasting, Withey was like a fly landing on him.
 
I didnt see it, did the TNT crew give the Jazz any respect post-game? Or are they acting like we don't have a chance? I've gone from thinking we might lose this series even with Rudy to thinking we would get crushed without him to thinking we will win game three without him and possibly the series even if he doesn't come back. That was the best LA will play this whole series, IMO.
 
The rim-protection last night was abysmal. If this is what Favors looks like at "100%", then I'm done with him.

The team looked half-asleep and half-scared. It's amazing to me that the game was that close. This is a game that a low-talent spark plug would've been useful. I don't know if Bolomboy or the carcass of Alec Burks would've been a net-negative, but it feels like it might've been worth a shot. I don't know, but we know what a team without Rudy actually looks like and I was not impressed.
 
Last edited:
Clippers are squeezing the Jazz offense and the slowdown offense of the Jazz allows Paul out front and Mbah Boute at the wing and Jordan down low to set up.That's OK if Jazz can do the same with Gobert anchoring the Jazz defense.Clippers owned the paint and Favors barely slowed them down.Jazz can't be weak in the middle of the paint and expect to win this series.Quin Snyder is trying to win on defense ALONE while their Defensive Player of the Year is out injured.
I think Jazz need Exum,Burks,Hood ,JJ,Withey playing the 2nd unit ,Jazz need the change of pace and hopefully generate more offense.
 
DownUnder said:
For those who haven't been watching basketball this year, Burks offense and individual iso's have become consistently predictable, wild turnover or missed shot followed by Burks falling to the floor while a fast break gives 2 points to the other team. He's near the worst in the NBA on isolations and finishing at the rim. The only good thing he's done this year is rebound the hell out of it.
Click to expand...
Played pretty good defense too.
But everything else you said is accurate and his rebounding and ok defense is not enough to overcome the negatives.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using JazzFanz mobile app
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top