What's new
By:

Game 3 Thread: 6:30 PM MT Time

Saint Cy of JFC said:
There is nothing to disagree or agree with. I'm right. It's not an opinion, it's a fact.

If the playoffs are a storyline, then the Finals are the end of the story. If the ending is great, then you can't call the story "anti-climatic". There is nothing to argue.
Click to expand...
There is though. If a tv show sucks until the finale then I quit watching and consider it a crappy show. If a movie sucks for an hour and a half and then the last 15 minutes are good then it's a crappy movie to me. Plus we don't even know if the finals will be good or not. That's not a fact as it hasn't happened yet. It's a hypothesis, an assumption.

Agree to disagree.
 
str8line said:
Where would we be right now if George Hill, Rodney Hood, Derrick Favors and Joe Ingles played up instead of down?
Click to expand...
And Lyles ingles and burks. We will be better next year. Booker it.



We got the worst injury wise and performance wise from many of our guys yet still won 50+ games and got the 2nd round and battled against one of the best teams of all time.

2 more first round picks next year too.

Future is bright
 
fishonjazz said:
There is though. If a tv show sucks until the finale then I quit watching and consider it a crappy show. If a movie sucks for an hour and a half and then the last 15 minutes are good then it's a crappy movie to me. Plus we don't even know if the finals will be good or not. That's not a fact as it hasn't happened yet. It's a hypothesis, an assumption.

Agree to disagree.
Click to expand...

Holy **** did you even bother reading what I wrote?
 
fishonjazz said:
There is though. If a tv show sucks until the finale then I quit watching and consider it a crappy show. If a movie sucks for an hour and a half and then the last 15 minutes are good then it's a crappy movie to me. Plus we don't even know if the finals will be good or not. That's not a fact as it hasn't happened yet. It's a hypothesis, an assumption.

Agree to disagree.
Click to expand...

I think he's just objecting to the use of the term "anti-climatic", which means you were disappointed by the climax of the playoffs.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Holy **** did you even bother reading what I wrote?
Click to expand...
You said the finals will be great.

A. Even if they are I don't consider 7 great games and 60 crappy ones "great playoffs"
B. The finals might suck too. They haven't happened yet.
 
I don't feel like **** after this loss, so that's a win.
 
Siro said:
I think he's just objecting to the use of the term "anti-climatic", which means you were disappointed by the climax of the playoffs.
Click to expand...
Fair enough. We don't know if they will be anticlimactic yet or not. We just know that the majority of the playoff will suck.

I like reading books, watching TV shows, and movies (not to mention sports)

If only the final part is climactic then the whole thing sucked overall imo and that is the issue.
 
fishonjazz said:
You said the finals will be great.

A. Even if they are I don't consider 7 great games and 60 crappy ones "great playoffs"
B. The finals might suck too. They haven't happened yet.
Click to expand...

Please read what I wrote. Focus carefully because I covered all of this. Holy ****.
 
We did good with turn overs. But man bad shooting this whole series really killing us.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Please read what I wrote. Focus carefully because I covered all of this. Holy ****.
Click to expand...
No thanks. Make things clearer. I keep reiterating my point. You can too.
 
fishonjazz said:
No thanks. Make things clearer. I keep reiterating my point. You can too.
Click to expand...

A dude called the playoffs anti-climatic.

I said you can't call something anti-climatic until you've seen the ending and that the Warriors/Cavs matchup is set-up to be very exciting.

I said if the NBA season were a story, the beginning of the playoffs would be the middle. You can call that part crappy, it doesnt mean it's anti-climatic.

It's not hard to read.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
A dude called the playoffs anti-climatic.

I said you can't call something anti-climatic until you've seen the ending and that the Warriors/Cavs matchup is set-up to be very exciting.

I said if the NBA season were a story, the beginning of the playoffs would be the middle. You can call that part crappy, it doesnt mean it's anti-climatic.

It's not hard to read.
Click to expand...
Ok. Then you MIGHT be right. The finals MIGHT be a great climax. The playoffs as a whole, in general suck doe.

I don't like that personally.
 
I still didn't understand the Jazz medical staff strategy during the season.

I thought they took cautious approach with the injured players resting them longer than expected to make sure they will be at 100% during playoff times. I was wrong.

Burks played almost the entire season then they suddenly shut him down during the playoffs.
 
Cool. I never argued with you about that at all. I dont care if you like it/dont like it, but it's set up to have a very exciting end. Someone calling it anti-climatic sounds silly and bitter just because their favorite team isnt going to do well. The reality is 90% of casual NBA fans dont care and just want to see the heavyweight fight at the end.
 
fishonjazz said:
Lol. That is rich coming from you. How often do you acknowledge someone else's side of a discussion?
Click to expand...

Always, that whole discussion was me taking what someone said and analyzing it and making a point. You didnt read anything I said and interjected yourself into it and just made it about your opinion on the playoffs as a whole rather than what we were discussing (what anti-climatic means in the context of the playoffs).
 
This team is just not good enough to be anything close to a contender. Two consistently productive players won't get you to the finals.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top