What's new

El Paso Shooting

Read the 2nd Amendment. It's there for a reason. It's not a difficult concept bro.
You still didn't answer the question. Lol.
You sure do make things difficult.
The 2nd amendment doesn't say that anyone NEEDS an AR15 (or any gun for that matter)

He asked YOU why YOU need an AR15.
This should be a really easy question to answer for God's sake.
Just say I don't need one, I wanted one so I bought one.

Just like I don't need a camping trailer but I bought one cause I wanted one.

What happened to you, you used to be reasonable and now are just difficult about everything.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Again, you didn't answer the question.
Do you think your AR15 is going to be taken away soon? If yes, then why do you think that? If no, then you are worrying over nothing like a child worrying about a bogeyman under the bed.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
I think people are trying there hardest bit it will never happen. You know why? Because the 2nd Amendment has me protected from such tyranny.
 
Why do you need an AR 15?

I just don't get it.
Many people have things they want and do not need. Do you have an Xbox or switch or something? More than 1 car maybe? Hobbies and recreation come in many forms. I really enjoy shooting guns. I've participated in some shooting competitions, amateur of course. I like it. I'd rather do that than play Xbox.
 
I think people are trying there hardest bit it will never happen. You know why? Because the 2nd Amendment has me protected from such tyranny.
Agreed. So the bogeyman won't get you. We both agree. So stop acting so worried about something that you seem to know will never happen. That's just silly.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Many people have things they want and do not need. Do you have an Xbox or switch or something? More than 1 car maybe? Hobbies and recreation come in many forms. I really enjoy shooting guns. I've participated in some shooting competitions, amateur of course. I like it. I'd rather do that than play Xbox.
Exactly. This should have been the obvious answer in the first place.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
My argument is that guns are not the ones pulling the trigger.

Good luck changing people and human nature. It's best if there are no triggers to pull in the majority of situations.

Pretty much every single person I know owns a gun. If it was truly a gun problem why are we not shooting each other.

People are shooting each other. That's why people are mad. Good job on not shooting your acquaintances.

It's a systematic problem. My point is also that a good chunk of shootings are from illegally owned firearms. How does taking away the rights of law abiding citizens help solve illegal firearm shootings? It doesn't.


I've stated this before and it isn't really part of my argument today since i'm only really attempting to establish that our country minus all our guns (especially the illegal ones) would be a safer country. However, since you've brought it up, just because people procure illegal fire arms now isn't a good defense for no gun control. If a ban could be accomplished and law abiding citizens turned in their guns like the good citizens that they are:

1.) Police and citizens alike know that anybody with a gun is now a criminal. Go get em. they're gonna get got.

2.) after the illegal gun owner crackdown, guns would be a lot harder to obtain illegally. The supply just isn't there. Ask your average prospective Japanese criminal how and if they could get a gun.

As far as taking guns completely away, all you have to do is look at human kind since creation. We have been killing each other since day one over petty ********. Hell not too long ago the twin towers burned, and before that we nuked an entire city. Its absolutely naive to think humans have evolved enough to not cause something catastrophic.

Does that mean I'm paranoid? No. But my guns sitting in a locked up safe are hurting nobody. Hell I see people in this very forum call Trump Hitler. Not on my watch if that's true...

You're right, there is a subset of the population that is prone to violence. Wouldn't it be best if their access to lethal means was lessened?

Also, You're ignoring the rest of the world again. The United States doesn't exist in a vacuum. You should go live abroad for an extended period and see

1.) If you have what it takes to adapt to a new culture.

2.) Get out of your ethnocentric mindset and see that there are other ways of living that may or may not be better than the way we insist on living in this country.
 


The leading Democratic candidate pledges to. I mean duh dude.
But you said that it won't ever happen. So forget about what some candidate says. Do you think your guns are gonna be taken? If you answer no, then go ahead and stop posting as if you think the answer is yes.
This isn't that hard.

Trump said he would build a wall and Mexico would pay for it. I wasn't worried about that happening as I knew there was no way in hell what he was saying was the truth.

Politicians say all kinds of things. Some of them are just bogeymen that you don't need to worry about. Your guns being taken away fall into the bogeyman category. You even said so yourself when you said guns being taken away won't happen.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
So I should lose my AR15 because people in inner cities are killing each other at an alarming rate with pistols?

Doesn't make sense to me.

So you're for a ban on pistols then? Or you'd be OK with everybody else getting banned but yourself and maybe some of your buddies?

You know I find it pretty callous what you're implying here. I mean, if it meant that people would stop dying if you personally gave up your weapon, would you do it? Like, theoretically?
 
So you're for a ban on pistols then? Or you'd be OK with everybody else getting banned but yourself and maybe some of your buddies?

You know I find it pretty callous what you're implying here. I mean, if it meant that people would stop dying if you personally gave up your weapon, would you do it? Like, theoretically?
Where did I say any of this?

Lol
 
Another myth the gun blaming type continue repeating is that US is the only place in the world with mass killings. False. US mass killing rate is comparable to other western nations, including Canada where they've used Van's and crossbows in addition to guns and stuff.

That alone justifies those warning you that if you take away guns people will find other means. Start focusing on the problem and not your preconceived agenda if you seek a solution.
 
Many people have things they want and do not need. Do you have an Xbox or switch or something? More than 1 car maybe? Hobbies and recreation come in many forms. I really enjoy shooting guns. I've participated in some shooting competitions, amateur of course. I like it. I'd rather do that than play Xbox.
Yeah, but the difference is the AR can only be used to shoot. While they may not account for many deaths, I just don't get why people want to own them simply because they can.

People are unpredictable, emotional, and have knee-jerk reactions. The less people with guns, the better.
 
Where did I say any of this?

Lol

I'm asking if you are for a ban on pistols? are you? It's those damn inner city people killin each other with their pistols ruining it for the rest of us right? So how about a ban on pistols. or a ban on weapons in the inner city only. how about that?
 
Another myth the gun blaming type continue repeating is that US is the only place in the world with mass killings. False. US mass killing rate is comparable to other western nations, including Canada where they've used Van's and crossbows in addition to guns and stuff.

That alone justifies those warning you that if you take away guns people will find other means. Start focusing on the problem and not your preconceived agenda if you seek a solution.

Find other means please. Better that those who are bent on killing find it harder to accomplish.

You choose

1.) some crazy walks in to your starbucks with a gun, any gun, and starts shooting.

2.) some crazy walks in to your starbucks with a crossbow and starts shooting. If he can even find a crossbow or a workable katana, or wants to like buy a goddamn van.

Either way, 99 times out of 100. your chances of survival are clearly higher in #2.
 
I'm asking if you are for a ban on pistols? are you? It's those damn inner city people killin each other with their pistols ruining it for the rest of us right? So how about a ban on pistols. or a ban on weapons in the inner city only. how about that?
As I already posted I'm all for extreme one strike you're out gun laws. You do a crime with a gun, you are done.

That's not the end all but how about we focus on the actual criminals for once instead of law abiding citizens? Crazy concept...
 
Find other means please. Better that those who are bent on killing find it harder to accomplish.

You choose

1.) some crazy walks in to your starbucks with a gun, any gun, and starts shooting.

2.) some crazy walks in to your starbucks with a crossbow and starts shooting. If he can even find a crossbow or a workable katana, or wants to like buy a goddamn van.

Either way, 99 times out of 100. your chances of survival are clearly higher in #2.

I agree.
 
Yeah, but the difference is the AR can only be used to shoot. While they may not account for many deaths, I just don't get why people want to own them simply because they can.

People are unpredictable, emotional, and have knee-jerk reactions. The less people with guns, the better.
I don't know, I could club you with the AR pretty good. Maybe go golfing with it. Throw it at someone. Use it as a cane. Probably some other things.
 
Back
Top