No VJ tonight is a bummer.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKXtV9IHwMM&ab_channel=Cashiggy
Anyone who thinks his handle or ability to create a shot is bad is a ****ing Tremendous Moron.
Easy buckets dont really exist in college basketball, at least not in the way they do in the NBA.His handle is very good for his age/size. He doesn't get past people though. In that clip he made a lot of tough shots. Kind of similar to the criticism of Ace Bailey, he didn't create any easy shots. I really don't care that much, as the rest of his game is so great. I do think it's fair to point out though, especially as people continue to criticize Ace for the same thing.
Easy buckets dont really exist in college basketball, at least not in the way they do in the NBA.
Difference between what him and Ace do is that Coop isnt shying away from contact.
In a league where there is no defensive 3 seconds that just doesnt happen. His teammates also arent the best or most experienced players and he's starting next to a true 5.Good point. It would be nice to see him get by his guy every once in awhile and get to the rim though. That doesn't have to be his game for him to be really good, but most number one scoring options in the NBA can do that regularly.
I don't see what you are referring to impacting what I am referring to, at least on the film that I've seen. What I see is Flagg on the perimeter, mostly being guarded by college forwards, and he doesn't have enough burst or craft to get by his guy.In a league where there is no defensive 3 seconds that just doesnt happen. His teammates also arent the best or most experienced players and he's starting next to a true 5.
Im just not seeing that.I don't see what you are referring to impacting what I am referring to, at least on the film that I've seen. What I see is Flagg on the perimeter, mostly being guarded by college forwards, and he doesn't have enough burst or craft to get by his guy.
This conversation is making me seem like a Flagg hater, which is really far from the truth. For the record I think Flagg is good enough and effects enough things on offense and defense that he's a winning player and should go #1.
I think his athleticism and aggression on defense, not offense, is what makes him standout. His offense is extremely worrisome. A guy like Joson Sanon is probably a much better offensive prospect and are around the same size.V.J. Edgecombe's combination of high-level athleticism and aggressiveness on offense makes him a standout prospect, even if his shots aren't falling yet. IMO, he should be a top-half-of-the-lottery guy even if his numbers don't improve much.
You can kind of see it on Flagg too. He moves well and is aggressive but still has that HS kinda skinny gangliness to him. He looks young I guess is what I am saying. The jumpshot form needs some work but its funny for some to say he's not a great offensive prospect when he leads his team in pts and assists while playing phenomenal defense. I think there will always be some that like to go against the grain and might be overthinking it. He is a phenomenal prospect and very much worthy of being a consensus #1 guy.I was randomly comparing Paulo and Scottie to Flagg last night and realized that they were both a year older than Flagg during their freshman season. I find that the age thing is often used as an excuse for someone who plays really bad, but Flagg is on par with elite prospects and is also young. The difference in those early years can make a huge difference.
It doesn’t happen as often in NCAA, basketball, but look at International prospects who play in the same league from 18-19. The jump is not guaranteed, but they are often massive. Perhaps this is more pronounced in a league full of men vs older kids, but I think you get the idea.
I think Flagg would be #1 if he was a year older, but it’s interesting to think about just how good he’d be a year later.
V.J. Edgecombe's combination of high-level athleticism and aggressiveness on offense makes him a standout prospect, even if his shots aren't falling yet. IMO, he should be a top-half-of-the-lottery guy even if his numbers don't improve much.