NAOS
Well-Known Member
Surely you recognize that this is an awful answer. It's tested because it's important. It's important because it's tested.
he "knows" it's important.
you and I "think" it isn't.
That is his more refined answer.
Surely you recognize that this is an awful answer. It's tested because it's important. It's important because it's tested.
This is almost assuredly true.
Archie, I don't think I'm disagreeing with you that strength is important as a physical skill to play basketball. I do disagree that the sole test of how many 185 pound bench presses can a player do is at all valuable in determining a) whether a player is strong in the kind of ways that are important for NBA play or b) whether a player will succeed at the NBA level.
Why do you think this particular test has any predictive power at all?
Surely you recognize that this is an awful answer.
he "knows" it's important.
you and I "think" it isn't.
That is his more refined answer.
So you can misstate easily verifiable facts?any chance you guys are going to take care of this at the flagpole and let the rest of us have our basketball forum back? just checking...
Child,
Please let the adults speak here.
Now, now, run away...
To say that the bench press has no importance at all is just ridiculous.
I think what Archie is trying to say is that the information is important, because it's information on the player. All information is important. To say that the bench press has no importance at all is just ridiculous. Yes, if you have a player as skilled as KD, you overlook it. If you are drafting with later picks, maybe you see a SF who is a senior and still can't bench 185. That would be cause for concern and may sway you from not picking him.
who said this in such a black and white way?
Kicky, to which you agreed and said he defeated me. Moran.
Holy ****. I actually read the last three pages of this thread. My opinion.
Archie: Probably should have stopped responding once it was obvious NAOS was having a panty-meet-wad moment.
NAOS: Probably should have self-recognized his pantywaddedness and refrained from continuing.
Cyrone: Crashed the party and didn't bring anything worth posting.
PKM: See Cyrone (above). And probably doesn't understand the history of Archie acting dick and not being able to take it back.
Holy ****. I actually read the last three pages of this thread. My opinion.
Archie: Probably should have stopped responding once it was obvious NAOS was having a panty-meet-wad moment.
NAOS: Probably should have self-recognized his pantywaddedness and refrained from continuing.
Cyrone: Crashed the party and didn't bring anything worth posting.
PKM: See Cyrone (above).
PKM: See Cyrone (above). And probably doesn't understand the history of Archie acting dick and not being able to take it back.
I'll be the first to admit I'm a dick and as hormonal as NUMERICA, but I wasn't the bitch *** who posted a picture of someone and acted like I was better than them in this thread. I did that one time (to Kicky) in which I realized how bone headed it was and apologized to him.
funny how you dudes think I'm actually riled up instead of just playing Archie's own game back at him... which he, funnily, can't handle. I have no investment in this.
As for PKM and Cy, well, their post counts and their presences in this discussion suggest that it is they who are riled up.
so, are you saying that you have a history of being a dick + posting pictures of other people in threads?
funny how you dudes think I'm actually riled up instead of just playing Archie's own game back at him... which he, funnily, can't handle. I have no investment in this.
As for PKM and Cy, well, their post counts and their presences in this discussion suggest that it is they who are riled up.