Kanter has patience and understands the situation he is in. A lot of people want to hate on Corbin/FO for the approach they are taking in developing Favors/Kanter, but we can obviously see the improvement in IQ and skills, especially on Kanter's side (he had more room for improvement of course). So maybe the approach is actually the best one?
Obviously it's impossible to say with 100% certainty either way because we don't have a time machine to go back in time and try the "throw him into the fire" approach that some of you would prefer.
So, why can Corbin not just give them both 20-22 minutes each with Jefferson and Millsap getting around 26-28 minutes per game?
Very often, we saw games where the bench and so the young guys outplayed the startes but still did not get rewarded.
We saw games where Millsap and Jefferson each got 35 minutes and Kanter and Favors struggled to get any minutes on the floor.
Carroll and Burks were ignored very often, too.
As a coach, you have to reward your guys that give you the extra effort.
I don't have anything about slowly progressing our young players but I have a problem if our coach is very unfair in distributing the minutes. I know, it's not easy for a coach to manage the minutes and substitutions but Corbin has not been right with the way of not rewarding the players by giving them more minutes and trust.
At the end of the day, you stop the developement, motivation, will and confidence of young players if you do not even nearly treat them the way they deserve it.
Or can you give me a reason why Kanter, Burks, Favors or Carroll don't even get more minutes than last year?