What's new
By:

Following potential 2013 draftees

PKM said:
I don't really like the comp.. but that's what I usually say. I like McCollum.. not that I don't disagree with those that are pointing out weaknesses.... which is why he's not being mocked top10.
Click to expand...

Oh I don't think there's any comparison between Matthews and Bullock, they're completely different players. I wasn't trying to compare them, I was just pointing out that Bullock had better physical skills. I think Matthews is the better player by far.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
Yeah, but Austin has more of a position than Jones does/did.
Click to expand...

I know you'll call me a hater (KNOW it), but they both had a bad college experience and a coach that didn't help them exploit a natural position. WTF was Drew doing with Austin this year?????? Perry Jones?? Holy **** I swear any of us here would see PJIII was a PF.. not a SF.. not a center... it wastes the dev't and confidence of these young men.

They're all interested in a gimmick.
 
Oh, and how anybody can actually think that McGary is a better player than Zeller is beyond me. Zeller has actual post skills, McGary is essentially just a hustle player at this point. I mean, I don't even like Zeller that much...but he's far better than McGary.
 
PKM said:
I know you'll call me a hater (KNOW it), but they both had a bad college experience and a coach that didn't help them exploit a natural position. WTF was Drew doing with Austin this year?????? Perry Jones?? Holy **** I swear any of us here would see PJIII was a PF.. not a SF.. not a center... it wastes the dev't and confidence of these young men.

They're all interested in a gimmick.
Click to expand...

Seeing as the last 3 top prospects (Miller, Austin, Jones) have all under performed, I would consider that fairly sufficient evidence that Baylor (Drew) is not a good place to go to develop yourself into a NBA player.
 
Hantlers said:
Oh, and how anybody can actually think that McGary is a better player than Zeller is beyond me. Zeller has actual post skills, McGary is essentially just a hustle player at this point. I mean, I don't even like Zeller that much...but he's far better than McGary.
Click to expand...

Hantlers said:
For the life of me, I cannot figure out why players continue to play for Scott Drew.

Guess the money talks.
Click to expand...

I feel like you're hitting on me.
 
Hantlers said:
Oh, and how anybody can actually think that McGary is a better player than Zeller is beyond me. Zeller has actual post skills, McGary is essentially just a hustle player at this point. I mean, I don't even like Zeller that much...but he's far better than McGary.
Click to expand...

I can see the reasoning behind it. Both will be role players in the NBA. McGary already knows how to be an effective role player, so therefore his transition may be easier.

Zeller will have to go from being #1 option, to a role player, and that transition may be harder for him.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
Seeing as the last 3 top prospects (Miller, Austin, Jones) have all under performed, I would consider that fairly sufficient evidence that Baylor (Drew) is not a good place to go to develop yourself into a NBA player.
Click to expand...

Dang.. I'm actually enjoying this thread right now.
 
Cyrone Torbin said:
I can see the reasoning behind it. Both will be role players in the NBA. McGary already knows how to be an effective role player, so therefore his transition may be easier.

Zeller will have to go from being #1 option, to a role player, and that transition may be harder for him.
Click to expand...

Zeller would be a role player that can actually be an option on offense though. If he sets up down low, he has a myriad of moves that he can go to. McGary has 3 moves in his arsenal: 1) wide open jump shot provided by teammate, 2) dunk/layup off of offensive rebound, and 3) dunk/layup off of a pass provided by teammate. That's it. Zeller will be a far more consistent and reliable player.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top