What ARE Dal's thoughts on Burks? For reals.
I'm much, much more cautious with Burks than most here.
I like that he's improved his playmaking, his free-throw shooting, and his three-point shooting. He is a great finisher, and has good potential in this league as a scorer.
Personally, when I'm paying my guard big-money, I want a guard who makes the play of others better on top of being a good offensive weapon himself. I want a guard who, when he doesn't have his shot going, is able to contribute in other ways, and stay on the court. A lot of these things are relatively unanswerable for Burks, because his role has changed so much, and this is probably the first season that he's really had a prominent offensive role with this team.
Defensively, Burks has never stood out to me (admittedly, I haven't watched as many games this season as in years past).
Either way, I like Hayward as a player more than Burks, and if I had to choose between the two then I go with Hayward. Of course, if Hayward is asking for the max, and we can lock up Burks for a 4 year/32 million dollar contract, then obviously you consider moving on with Burks-- but I just like what Hayward might bring to the table for the future of this core, if we can draft a 1st-option-on-offense wing to pair with Hayward, Favors, and Burke.
Burks has been an awesome surprise this season, and Kanter (other than last night) has been by-and-large a disappointment.