2014 College Football

[scootsy]

Congrats on being a normal person.

lol.

 

[trigg3r]

Just saw the video for the first time. LOL. I am glad that he is excited, but it was over the top.....

 

[Duck Rodgers]

Wow, Arizona really **** the bed. Glad I didn't attempt to watch that one.

 

[8]

Welp, looks like a 6 team playoff would be the best for this season

 

[UGLI baby]

Should be...

#1-3 Bama, Oregon, FSU in some order.

#4 Ohio St.


Big 12 needs to play a Conference Championship game like everyone else. It for sure can't be TCU. I don't see how TCU gets in over Baylor with Baylor beating them.

 

[♪alt13]

Ohio state is definitely in IMO.

Not only did the win the conference championship but they looked good doin it. 59-0

 

[8]

Should be...

#1-3 Bama, Oregon, FSU in some order.

#4 Ohio St.


Big 12 needs to play a Conference Championship game like everyone else. It for sure can't be TCU. I don't see how TCU gets in over Baylor with Baylor beating them.

Nah, they really don't. What if TCU went undefeated and Baylor lost once in the regular season to them and then beat them in a conference championship? It'd be the same thing. It's only a big deal because they finished with the same amount of losses. It's up to the committee to decide what they'd like. That's their job.

 

[♪alt13]

Nah, they really don't. What if TCU went undefeated and Baylor lost once in the regular season to them and then beat them in a conference championship? It'd be the same thing. It's only a big deal because they finished with the same amount of losses. It's up to the committee to decide what they'd like. That's their job.

It's also the difference between 11-1 and 12-1

It isn't the same thing anyway.

 

[UGLI baby]

Nah, they really don't. What if TCU went undefeated and Baylor lost once in the regular season to them and then beat them in a conference championship? It'd be the same thing. It's only a big deal because they finished with the same amount of losses. It's up to the committee to decide what they'd like. That's their job.

Lol

 

[8]

Lol

How would that not create the same scenario? Two one loss teams each having lost once to one another


Would actually be worse

 

[8]

It's also the difference between 11-1 and 12-1

It isn't the same thing anyway.

Well, duh, it's not the same thing. That's why people don't like it. Everyone plays everyone so that way they can have a 'true' champion. Yes, they have teams that share titles. The conference really doesn't care about making things 'simpler' for the playoff committee. That's just how they view things.

 

[8]

Really a genius move by the Big 12. The conference is generally strong enough to get a one loss team in the playoff and instead of eliminating one by having TCU and Baylor play each other again, they have two teams in contention for a spot.

 

[8]

As far as 11-1 vs. 12-1, they lose out on that extra creampuff non-conference game by playing an additional conference game. I guess that's a huge deal..

 

[8]

Also, I really don't care for Jameis Winston.

 

[UGLI baby]

How would that not create the same scenario? Two one loss teams each having lost once to one another


Would actually be worse

Huh?

I'm not talking about it from the same standpoint as you. I'm saying teams from the Big 12 should be viewed slightly lower than teams from other conferences because the "gauntlet" that they have to run through includes one less difficult game, the conference championship game.

Ohio st, TCU, and Baylor are all pretty even, which one won a conference championship game?

 

[UGLI baby]

Really a genius move by the Big 12. The conference is generally strong enough to get a one loss team in the playoff and instead of eliminating one by having TCU and Baylor play each other again, they have two teams in contention for a spot.

Genius move that will keep them from having a team in the playoff.

Big 12 will be looked at on a slightly lower tier than the rest of the P5 conferences until they have a conference championship game.

 

[8]

Huh?

I'm not talking about it from the same standpoint as you. I'm saying teams from the Big 12 should be viewed slightly lower than teams from other conferences because the "gauntlet" that they have to run through includes one less difficult game, the conference championship game.

Ohio st, TCU, and Baylor are all pretty even, which one won a conference championship game?

Oh, so a conference championship game is the determinant of which team is better between conferences? The MAC and WAC and ballsack conference championship winners are superior to a 1 loss team from the big 12 or a hypothetically 1 loss Notre Dame? The committee can decide that if they want, choosing who they think is better between Baylor and TCU isn't that big of a deal considering they have to choose between 1 loss teams from different conferences. That seems way harder

 

[8]

Genius move that will keep them from having a team in the playoff.

Big 12 will be looked at on a slightly lower tier than the rest of the P5 conferences until they have a conference championship game.

The committee is picking who they believe to be the best teams, not creating a conferences pecking order

 

[8]

And so TCU and Baylor play a game and one of them wins. The committee now has a clear top 4 teams?

 

[8]

Also, I can buy the committee selecting Ohio St. over TCU and Baylor. But I'm not stupid enough to believe that they come to this conclusion by saying Big 10 > big 12, therefore OSU > TCU and Baylor. They'd pick OSU because they think they are better than TCU and Baylor.

Lol. You are delusional.