What's new
By:

All else being equal, who would you rather have running the Jazz: Bledsoe or Burke

Who would you rather have as the Jazz PG of the future?

  • Total voters
    57
  • Poll closed .
Jazz4ever said:
It's very close obviously. The nice thing about getting Bledsoe this year is we get a year and a half trial run before having to pay him big bucks. If he doesn't work out, can trade him before his RFA comes up and still get some return, and go after Kasey Hill or Andrew Harrison .
Click to expand...

Yes, Yes, YES!!!

Go with this. Absolutely this!

Rep'd

/thread
 
NUMBERICA said:
Except that the guy was nabbed for scraps that almost everyone wishes we had back? And that he was the spearhead to the complete collapse of a franchise? How does your own *** taste?

This isn't about Sap, this is about Jefferson being not good at basketball and not deserving of his salary, his possessions, or his minutes.
Click to expand...


pull no punches!
 
PointGod_AlecBurks said:
1360784312_skier_avalanche_backflip__sverre_liliequist.gif
Click to expand...

That is one crazy-azz skier.
 
Thee jazz fan said:
Ty wanted to run and play a uptempo offense, and was doing just that, then Mo got hurt and you can't do that with Tinsley and Watson.
Click to expand...
I don't want to side-track this discussion but I'll say this: Mo injured his thumb December 22nd and on December 24th the Jazz ranked in the bottom-half of the league (19th) in pace so I think asking if Utah can/will push-the-tempo w/Bledsoe at the helm is a legitimate question.
 
vslice02 said:
I don't want to side-track this discussion but I'll say this: Mo injured his thumb December 22nd and on December 24th the Jazz ranked in the bottom-half of the league (19th) in pace so I think asking if Utah can/will push-the-tempo w/Bledsoe at the helm is a legitimate question.
Click to expand...

Also, Mo has never been a transition PG. Also, the Jazz offense is held together/held back by the illusion that the last guy down the court will bail them out on every possession.
 
I think that's a wrap. Bledsoe it is (22-14 as of this post).

KOC/Lindsey - if you're reading this - please make it happen. Pretty please....
 
This is the dumbest debate ever. If burk was too even sniff bledsoes jock...in this draft.....we would not be in contentio to even get him becausenhe would bena top 8 pick.
 
Catchall said:
If you could choose, with all other factors being equal, who would you rather have running the Jazz at PG?
Click to expand...

Bledsoe to me cause he's true PG. Also he's the last key for the future as being more piece to youngsters. Bledsoe-Burks-Hayward-Kanter-Favors

Bledsoe is one of the best defenders among PGs, so strong and explosive. He can steal,block,make dribbling to the rim and increase our pace on offense. I really wish Millsap trade happens and we can prepare for the next season now on.
 
Vermin said:
This is the dumbest debate ever. If burk was too even sniff bledsoes jock...in this draft.....we would not be in contentio to even get him becausenhe would bena top 8 pick.
Click to expand...

Yeah, because he would only be good if he is a top 10 pick. Because Bledose was when he got drafted also.........
 
I'm having a hard time believing Burke will be around at any of our picks or that we'll have an opportunity to move up.
 
Does it really matter? Corbin will just play Tinsley and Watson ahead of them. You know KOC is going to re-sign both of those guys, along with Mo. So why do we want a 4th-stringer?

That said, I'd probably go with Bledsoe. But Burke is a good prospect; he could turn into something special.
 
No reason you can't have both. Trade Millsap for Bledsoe and draft Burke. Let Mo Williams go. Keep either Tinsley or Watson as the 3rd PG/Mentor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top