Jazz basketball deprivation starting to kick in. The threads created in these next few days will test us.
It's going to be via trade. Count on it.
Jazz have some cap space + almost $13M in non-guaranteed contracts.
It's going to be via trade. Count on it.
Jazz have some cap space + almost $13M in non-guaranteed contracts.
Didn't realize that. Oh well, Jazz can use the non-guaranteed contracts in almost the same way. Renounce the players to free up the $13M in cap space and then do an uneven trade (for example, taking on ~$25M and giving back only Burks at $12M). Taking on Crowder prevents Jazz from opening up a max slot, but if Jazz really needed to clear that much cap room, Jae is an easily tradeable player.The new CBA does not allow for non guarantees to be counted towards meeting salary matching requirements anymore.
Bradley to me seems like a good option if we can't afford a max player. He would be a player you sign if exum demands too much a la George hill.
Plus, Dennis Lindsey goes after players he likes. That has been a trend at least. There was an inquiry into Bradley...
The Jazz have tried to monopolize some of the best defensive talent in the league and Bradley fits right there. But you can almost pick two of the three (favors, bradley, exum) if you can dump Burks IF this summer's spending is low as predicted.