NAOS
Well-Known Member
I wasn't a big fan of Clinton while he was in office, but in hindsight... not so bad. A walk in the park compared to his successors.
If he were running as a third option, I'd seriously consider him.
He's a bit of a dog, but comparing him to Trump is apples and watermelons (I know you weren't the one who made that comparison, [MENTION=26]Gameface[/MENTION]).
Trump is bad, very bad, at being a respectable human being. While being a raging sexist and racist isn't a crime (yet) it's not what makes a good leader for such a diverse country. Trump is divisive, and we need unity more than anything else. A leader that nobody trusts is useless as a leader.
For the record, Hillary is also impossible to trust.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz mobile app
I pretty strongly maintain that anybody who seriously looks into the Clinton Presidency (especially using the clarity of hindsight) will mostly likely conclude that it was a bloody disaster.
It's a sign of our political corruption (societally speaking) that we sharply contrast Reagan and Clinton. They are two peas in a pod right there.